From: Ethan A M. <sf...@us...> - 2019-02-22 22:39:26
|
On Friday, February 22, 2019 1:57:37 PM PST Ethan A Merritt via gnuplot-beta wrote: > Exactly. > This seems like a hint either that "git log" is the wrong tool > or that it could be improved by tracking a bit more history. > Can't the cherry-pick operation itself be recorded as a transaction? > Then a hypothetical command option "git log --show-origin" > would list entries as > > %%% > [4] git status > On branch branch-5-2-stable > > [5] git log --show-origin HEAD~1..HEAD > > commit d83adc16f5a572f5d004963ead8326591498dd41 > Author: Ethan A Merritt <merritt@u.washington.edu> > Date: Tue Feb 19 23:10:08 2019 -0800 > Origin: cherry-pick from master/83a349a07b3f30d3f0c11ff80152f3cb96ff3c77 > > <body of commit message text> > %%% After some delving I have discovered that this used to be the default in git but for some reason it was removed! The current documentation suggests that "git cherry-pick -x" may save the history I want. So I will use that going forward. thanks for putting up with my incomplete progress as a git user Ethan |