Re: Release 5.2.4

[Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...>]

Shigeharu Takeno found that


In docs/titlepag.tex in gnuplot-5.2.4.tar.gz


There described

%  31 May 2017 Version 5.2
   Version 5.2.3 (May 2018)

gnuplot.pdf on SourceForge, the version number is 5.2.4 but source for document tar ball
is still 5.2.3.

I propose to make a fixed tar ball named like gnuplot-5.2.4-1.tar.gz.


Tatsuro



----- Original Message -----
> From: sfeam via gnuplot-beta <gnu...@li...>
> To: gnu...@li...
> Cc: 
> Date: 2018/6/5, Tue 13:18
> Subject: Release 5.2.4
> 
> Release 5.2.4 source tarball is ready and can be downloaded from
> 
>     
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplot/files/gnuplot/5.2.4/gnuplot-5.2.4.tar.gz
> 
> This release contains
> - a fix for a serious regression reported against 5.2.3 (spurious
>   evaluation of logscale coordinates as UNDEFINED)
> - re-implementation of the "refresh" command to correct regressions in
>   5.2.0 through 5.2.3
> - sanity checks for several invalid command sequences found by fuzzing
> - several minor bug-fixes
> - two recent minor changes back-ported from the development version
> 
> Yes it's only been a month since 5.2.3 but I think the regression
> in plotting logscale axes is serious enough to warrant an immediate fix.
> If you want to test before/after here is a simple trigger for the error:
>     set log y
>     plot [1:100] x**2, 1/0
> 
> Windows binaries will follow eventually.
> 
>     happy gnuplotting
> 
>         Ethan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> gnuplot-beta mailing list
> gnu...@li...
> Membership management via: 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
>