From: sfeam <sf...@us...> - 2018-04-06 16:18:53
|
On Friday, 06 April 2018 08:53:52 sfeam via gnuplot-beta wrote: > On Friday, 06 April 2018 15:27:10 Petr Mikulik wrote: > > I build gnuplot on OS/2 via gcc/emx. The binary then runs on OS/2, > > eCommStation, DOS with emx.exe or rsx.exe. Thus it is necessary to keep > > __OS2__ and __EMX__. > > > > The gcc/emx I use is gcc 2.8.1, and it does not know command line option > > "-std=c99". > > Do you use (or build) the emxvga terminal? > The source is basically untouched since 2002. > > > I've prepared some patches for OS/2 in 2017 but not committed them due to the > > transfer of cvs to git. I'll have to learn how to submit them. > > > > BTW, would not C99 syntax break VMS/VAX compilers? Its makefile is still > > in the config/ directory. I went back and looked at the documentation. C99 has been supported by the OpenVMS C compiler since the mid 2000s. So I don't think that by itself is a concern. > VMS support is also a candidate for being dropped. > I was myself test-building releases on VMS through version 4.6 > but I no longer have a bootable VMS machine. To the extent that VMS > lives on in the larger world, it is via emulation on virtual machines. > I have not been able to find any mention of gnuplot being used in that > context, but even if it is I imagine that the output is not via > the VAX Windowing System (vws.trm). > > Ethan |