|
From: Ethan A M. <sf...@us...> - 2012-08-22 18:41:17
|
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:28:09 am Daniel J Sebald wrote: > On 08/22/2012 12:56 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > > > I don't know if leaving out the X11 terminal is a good idea. At least > > one of the apps I know of will choose "x11" if the user doesn't set an > > environment variable specifying an alternative gnuplot terminal. So, if > > the distro creators leave out x11 that will cause problems in at least > > this case. > > I should say that, as well, an app may want to have both x11 and qt, for > example. A reasonable scenario is: run from the command line, x11, and > run from a UI, qt. > > I've done some compilations here to check sizes: > > gnuplot with x11 and qt: 3462231 > gnuplot with x11, no qt: 3067584 > > So, qt adds 13%. That is a fairly big addition if qt isn't used. For > the qt user though it isn't a concern because of the added support. If you care about total size you should include the respective outboard drivers: text data bss dec hex filename 1385735 72836 57408 1515979 1721cb gnuplot # includes x11 + wxt + qt 91517 4788 12704 109009 1a9d1 gnuplot_x11 141992 2120 744 144856 235d8 gnuplot_qt > gnuplot with qt, no x11: (I don't see a way to disable x11 terminal) ./configure --without-x |