From: Petr M. <mi...@ph...> - 2007-06-01 15:41:35
|
> > > 1) It already exists in the form of the ctrl-q option in x11 and wxt > > > 2) This is doomed to be completely opaque to the user, as is the curr= ent > > > ctrl-q solution in my opinion > >=20 > > My proposal is different from ctrl-q. It describes the inner way of=20 > > gnuplot code, not a user interface/option. This must be hidden from the= =20 > > user; user does not care about the implementation of built-in bindings. >=20 > Timoth=C3=A9e's point is that the ctrl-q mechanism already implements you= r > on/off proposal. So far as I understand what you are proposing, there > would be no difference between your "off" state and the current=20 > "ctrlq" state (except, of course, what happens if you type ctrl-q :-) No, my proposal allows to (re)bind 'q' during gnuplot running. > I have a much simpler proposal. > Let's get rid of the 'q' and ' ' built-ins altogether. >=20 > Any usable window manager provides at least one button and/or hotkey > to kill windows, and the local user is familiar with the conventions > of his own desktop. Why should we duplicate, badly, what is already > present?=20 Windows can be closed by Alt-F4. I'm strictly against smashing ' '. It's the most useful hotkey! It does muc= h=20 more than a window manager can offer (it finds the parent terminal, which= =20 may be a gnuplot session, octave session, etc.!). --- PM |