From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2007-05-31 21:24:50
|
On Thursday 31 May 2007 14:17, Petr Mikulik wrote: > >=20 > > It is not as simple as you make it sound. > > Consider the example Timoth=C3=A9e already mentioned. > > You have an old x11 plot window open, but the current terminal > > is something else. Maybe wxt, maybe postscript, ... whatever. >=20 > Then you mean that "bind" command should work always to all screen=20 > terminals. Then it seems to be even more easily coded: I apologize for not explaining clearly enough. I will try once more. There is a problem with moving ' ' or 'q' into the general "bind" mechanism, and the same problem applies to extending "bind all" to handle multiple active terminal types. The problem is not anything to do with handling the event once we see it. The existing code, or trivial extensions, can handle that easily. The problem is that _we do not see_ the keystroke or mouse events from previously active terminals. Only those from the current terminal. =2D-=20 Ethan A Merritt |