Re: Build problem

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Ethan A Merritt wrote:
> On Saturday 08 July 2006 08:33 am, Juergen Wieferink wrote:
> 
>>parse.c:846: warning: `is_ud_function' defined but not used
> 
> 
> That is a result of a patch yesterday from Dan Sebald.
> The patch was not correct. Instead the changes of 2006-06-11 should
> have been reverted entirely.  Unfortunately, I don't know how to issue
> a "revert to verion xxx" command in cvs.  Is that even possible?
> I guess I'll have to manually extract the earlier version and re-submit
> it as if it were new.

That's the warning?  Just yank out that function.  Trying to revert is a lot of effort.  Keep the test that verifies the number of input arguments at interpretation time.

What we could have done for the parse-time test was to change it from int_error() to int_warn().  In some sense that is a good warning... and if the user intended to redefine a function, he or she can say back to the screen "I know that, gnuplot!"

Dan