Re: smooth shading & terminal specialities

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Hans-Bernhard Br=F6ker wrote:

>> The idea would be that for terminals which don't support term->image()=
=20
>> there would be a base version of image_rhombus() (or some such thing)=20
>> that draws an image using rhombuses and effectively acts the way pm3d=20
>> currently does.
>=20
>=20
> Feel free to write a do_image(), put it in term.c, and add it do the=20
> adapter class by updating the "class loader".

OK, thanks.  That is sort of what I had envisioned early on, but didn't w=
ant to touch too much code initially.

Dan