Re: slow drawing with large images

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Hans-Bernhard Br=F6ker wrote:
> Factor of 2 of waste is not really excessive.

Shouldn't be too bad.  Factor of 2 at worst.  As far as having reassign m=
emory, with images having the array size, one would know right away the e=
ventual number of points.  With binary data, one could make a reasonable =
guess based on file size.  With ascii data, not worth the trouble as the =
reading of ascii data is just as consuming as reassigning memory.

>  But if you don't like it,=20
> it can always be replaced by something like
>=20
>     new_size =3D (1.5 * old_size + 1000)
>=20
> Call me biased, but I suspect this code had better use the existing=20
> dynarray.h stuff instead.  I broke that code out of hidden3d for a=20
> reason, see?

Wasn't aware of it.

Dan