|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2006-01-20 07:53:56
|
Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Don't know if I agree with the extent of that. That basically means no > copyright whatsoever. I'm not really against using open software in a > patched way. But there has to be some indication by the person doing > the distribution that said project was mainly developed by others and > made available freely and there is no warranty attributed to the > original source. > > It's a fair use issue as I see it. If someone sells a software product > that utilizes gnuplot, would that be breaking the copyright? I stand corrected, breaking the "license", not copyright. Dan |