gnuplot-beta

hidden3d plot in current cvs source

[Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...>]

Hello

I have noticed that recent snapshot 3d graph using hidden3d looks different from that made by previous
 version.  Some tics seems to fail to be hidden.  I do not know the exact date this phenomenon has
been appear.  I think that the snapshot made by older version seem to be correct.

I have confirmed X11, wxt and windows terminals.

http://www.geocities.jp/tmgpltwin/Files/Files.html#0050

0050 111023hidden_1.png, 25,253 bytes, 2011-01-23, example snapshot of hidden 3d produced gnuplot 4.5
(ChangeLog Date 2011-01-20)
0051 111023hidden_2.png, 18,552 bytes, 2011-01-23, example snapshot of hidden 3d produced gnuplot
4.4.0

Regards

Tatsuro

--------------------------------------
Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo! JAPAN
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ie8/

Re: hidden3d plot in current cvs source

[Hans-Bernhard B. <HBB...@t-...>]

On 23.01.2011 07:51, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:

> I have noticed that recent snapshot 3d graph using hidden3d looks
> different from that made by previous version. Some tics seems to fail
> to be hidden. I do not know the exact date this phenomenon has been
> appear.

That's pretty certainly a side effect of Ethan's change to graph3d.c 
dated 2011-01-20.  That change effectively killed depth information for 
the tickmarks, thus breaking hidden3d's chance to get it right.

Re: hidden3d plot in current cvs source

[sfeam (E. Merritt) <eam...@gm...>]

On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I have noticed that recent snapshot 3d graph using hidden3d looks different from that made by previous
>  version.  Some tics seems to fail to be hidden.  

My fault.  Last week's fix for bug #3157712 broke the hidden3d processing
of axis ticks.  I have reverted that patch and replaced it with one that
forces both the map3d_xy() and map3d_xyz() code paths to share the routine
used for transforming 3D coordinates.   

	Ethan



>  I do not know the exact date this phenomenon has
> been appear.  I think that the snapshot made by older version seem to be correct.
> 
> I have confirmed X11, wxt and windows terminals.
> 
> http://www.geocities.jp/tmgpltwin/Files/Files.html#0050
> 
> 0050 111023hidden_1.png, 25,253 bytes, 2011-01-23, example snapshot of hidden 3d produced gnuplot 4.5
> (ChangeLog Date 2011-01-20)
> 0051 111023hidden_2.png, 18,552 bytes, 2011-01-23, example snapshot of hidden 3d produced gnuplot
> 4.4.0
> 
> Regards
> 
> Tatsuro
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo! JAPAN
> http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ie8/
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
> Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
> Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
> February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> gnuplot-beta mailing list
> gnu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
> 

Re: hidden3d plot in current cvs source

[Tatsuro M. <tma...@ya...>]

Hello

Thank you for your reply
Now I am building using new snapshot.

I have noticed that the latest changelog date
is 2011-01-20. Is this 2011-01-24?

****************************
2011-01-20  Ethan A Merritt  <merritt@u.washington.edu>

	* src/graph3d.c (xtick_callback ytick_callback ztick_callbacke):
	Revert change made 2011-01-20 because it breaks hidden3d.
<snip>
********************

Regards

Tatsuro

--- "sfeam (Ethan Merritt)" wrote:

> On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > Hello
> > 
> > I have noticed that recent snapshot 3d graph using hidden3d looks different from that made by
> previous
> >  version.  Some tics seems to fail to be hidden.  
> 
> My fault.  Last week's fix for bug #3157712 broke the hidden3d processing
> of axis ticks.  I have reverted that patch and replaced it with one that
> forces both the map3d_xy() and map3d_xyz() code paths to share the routine
> used for transforming 3D coordinates.   
> 
> 	Ethan
> 
> 
> 
> >  I do not know the exact date this phenomenon has
> > been appear.  I think that the snapshot made by older version seem to be correct.
> > 
> > I have confirmed X11, wxt and windows terminals.
> > 
> > http://www.geocities.jp/tmgpltwin/Files/Files.html#0050
> > 
> > 0050 111023hidden_1.png, 25,253 bytes, 2011-01-23, example snapshot of hidden 3d produced
> gnuplot 4.5
> > (ChangeLog Date 2011-01-20)
> > 0051 111023hidden_2.png, 18,552 bytes, 2011-01-23, example snapshot of hidden 3d produced
> gnuplot
> > 4.4.0
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Tatsuro
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo! JAPAN
> > http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ie8/
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
> > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
> > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
> > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnuplot-beta mailing list
> > gnu...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-beta
> > 
> 
> 


--------------------------------------
Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo! JAPAN
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ie8/