|
From: Ethan A M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2006-06-29 05:56:16
|
I've just built and tested the current cvs version on VMS. I can't test x11 because it's a remote machine with no X connection available, but 'all.dem' run through 'set term post color solid' looks almost perfect. Only two glitches: 1) There are some spurious <null> characters at the end of each page of PostScript output. Perhaps some buffer flush oddity. 2) The column-stacked histogram demo has some missing boxes. I vaguely recall encountering that once before, but I can't remember what it turned out to be. Maybe some browsing through ChangeLog. Anyhow, given the huge number of changes since the last time I did a full build and test under VMS, I'm amazed how smooth it was. Somebody with a local box would have to test the x11 support, however. -- Ethan A Merritt Biomolecular Structure Center University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742 |
|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2006-06-29 16:53:24
|
Ethan A Merritt wrote: > I've just built and tested the current cvs version on VMS. > I can't test x11 because it's a remote machine with no X connection > available, but 'all.dem' run through 'set term post color solid' > looks almost perfect. > > Only two glitches: > 1) There are some spurious <null> characters at the end of each > page of PostScript output. Perhaps some buffer flush oddity. > 2) The column-stacked histogram demo has some missing boxes. > I vaguely recall encountering that once before, but I can't > remember what it turned out to be. Maybe some browsing through > ChangeLog. Didn't we recently have something with an extra "gprestore"? Anyway, maybe you could send an example output with the <null> chars and the missing boxes. (Just one page each.) Could think it through to see if there is a bug > Anyhow, given the huge number of changes since the last time > I did a full build and test under VMS, I'm amazed how smooth it was. > Somebody with a local box would have to test the x11 support, > however. That is amazing, but not surprising. I think I've said this before: the attention to detail since the 4.0 series has been very high. Dan |
|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2006-07-07 07:59:11
|
Ethan A Merritt wrote: > I've just built and tested the current cvs version on VMS. > I can't test x11 because it's a remote machine with no X connection > available, but 'all.dem' run through 'set term post color solid' > looks almost perfect. > > Only two glitches: > 2) The column-stacked histogram demo has some missing boxes. > I vaguely recall encountering that once before, but I can't > remember what it turned out to be. Maybe some browsing through > ChangeLog. This one is not VMS related. I see the missing boxes in both X11 and PostScript. I don't recall seeing this except only recently. Dan |
|
From: Ethan M. <merritt@u.washington.edu> - 2006-07-07 21:50:19
|
On Friday 07 July 2006 01:08 am, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Ethan A Merritt wrote: > > 2) The column-stacked histogram demo has some missing boxes. > > I vaguely recall encountering that once before, but I can't > > remember what it turned out to be. Maybe some browsing through > > ChangeLog. > > This one is not VMS related. I see the missing boxes in both X11 and > PostScript. I don't recall seeing this except only recently. Sigh. So it's something that broke very recently. That's the danger of this mad dash to close out all bug reports before a release. The fixes can have unintended side effects that are worse than the original problem. I wonder if it's somehow related to NaN / DF_MISSING... -- Ethan A Merritt Biomolecular Structure Center University of Washington, Seattle WA |
|
From: Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...> - 2006-07-07 21:59:56
|
Ethan Merritt wrote: > On Friday 07 July 2006 01:08 am, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > >>Ethan A Merritt wrote: >> >>>2) The column-stacked histogram demo has some missing boxes. >>>I vaguely recall encountering that once before, but I can't >>>remember what it turned out to be. Maybe some browsing through >>>ChangeLog. >> >>This one is not VMS related. I see the missing boxes in both X11 and >>PostScript. I don't recall seeing this except only recently. > > > Sigh. > > So it's something that broke very recently. > That's the danger of this mad dash to close out all bug reports > before a release. The fixes can have unintended side effects > that are worse than the original problem. Yes. But I think the process is going very well. We've been discovering and fixing a lot of things that would have been problematic to the release. > > I wonder if it's somehow related to NaN / DF_MISSING... That is exactly what I was thinking. So maybe that is a good place to start. Attached are the two problematic plots. Dan |