On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
[...]
> What do you think? Certainly, duplicating this code is a no-no. The
> core translation could be defined as a macro and included in two
> separate functions, one where xt and yt are doubles, one where xt and yt
> are unsigned ints...
As a matter of fact, map3d_xy() is a bit of a mess already as it is.
It does two unrelated jobs rolled into one function call. This
will need some cleanup eventually. But maybe not right now...
> or as I've argued in the discussion initiated by Ethan, just plain ints.
No. Using 'int' for this is a placebo. It may appear to cure the worst
of the symptoms, but that's more by coincidence and belief in the cure
than by design.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
|
