gnuplot-beta

Re: OK, then.

[Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...>]

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Lars Hecking wrote:

> Hans-Bernhard Broeker writes:
> > OK, guys, I did it.
> > 
> > A minute ago, I've uploaded the final release tarball to both my webspace
> > and to SF.net.  The very last last-minute change was Clark's go over all
> > the links in gnuplot.doc (and a corresponding rebuild of gnulot.texi by
> > me).
>  
>  There is no gnuplot.texi update in cvs, it seems.

There is now.  


-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

Re: OK, then.

[Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...>]

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Petr Mikulik wrote:

[...]
> move to proper FILES .. I don't know how.

No surprise there --- the "File Release System" is project administrators
only.  

> They should also go to
> 	/home/groups/g/gn/gnuplot/ftp
> together with the source .tar.gz and ANNOUNCEMENT to replace the older one.

I don't think so.  The per-project FTP service which this directory
represents has been discontinued ages ago.


-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (br...@ph...)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

Re: OK, then.

[Clark G. <ga...@di...>]

Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
> I don't think so.  The per-project FTP service which this directory
> represents has been discontinued ages ago.

Yes, but I've created htdocs/ftp which I can mirror with http.  This is just 
an idea: we can do this however we like.  But I was thinking it would be 
nice to have some easy way of putting stuff into ftp.gnuplot.info.  What I 
did last night was do a little pre-4.0 tarball just for a trial which I 
threw into ftp:/pub/gnuplot/current.

Any thoughts on how you think the ftp repository should work?  I like it's 
archival nature, but there are lots of ways to accomplish this idea.

--ckg