Menu
▾
▴
gitclipse-devel — Gitclipse development issues
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(113) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-31 15:18:16
|
Thanks I'll take a look. Not sure if we should consider this required for our initial alpha release. Of course it will be extremely bothersome to people if "undo/redo" doesn't work as expected, but I don't know if it should hold us up getting out of the door. I'll see what I can get done on it by Tuesday though. If anyone else wants to take a look at it as well, you're more than welcome too. Gitclipsers: Can put the final "stopper" bugs they're working on up on the sourceforge bug-tracker (to make us look like we're an active project). Thanks, -- Drew On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Patrick Winters wrote: > I would inspect the Subclipse codebase. > Just so you're aware there's an IUndoableOperation interface ... > http://help.eclipse.org/stable/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv > /reference/api/org/eclipse/core/commands/operations/IUndoableOperation.html > > I believe there's different types of operation histories too, so good luck. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- >> dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case >> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:29 AM >> To: gitclipse-devel >> Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Eclipse Undo >> >> So now that GitMoveDeleteHook is working, I was wondering if anyone >> knows >> how to hook into Undo or where to start looking for this? Currently if >> I >> delete a file, and then undo it, git still thinks the file is staged >> for >> deletion and that there is a new untracked file in it's place. >> >> -- >> Drew >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >> Git...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > |
|
From: Patrick W. <pat...@ny...> - 2008-07-31 14:21:55
|
I would inspect the Subclipse codebase. Just so you're aware there's an IUndoableOperation interface ... http://help.eclipse.org/stable/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv /reference/api/org/eclipse/core/commands/operations/IUndoableOperation.html I believe there's different types of operation histories too, so good luck. > -----Original Message----- > From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:29 AM > To: gitclipse-devel > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Eclipse Undo > > So now that GitMoveDeleteHook is working, I was wondering if anyone > knows > how to hook into Undo or where to start looking for this? Currently if > I > delete a file, and then undo it, git still thinks the file is staged > for > deletion and that there is a new untracked file in it's place. > > -- > Drew > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-31 13:10:59
|
Would it be easier and make more sense to users if we provide two different commit menu options. One being a "commit staged" and one being "commit all"? I would think the actual commit wizard itself could just have a checkbox that a user could select "commit all unstaged changes" which would basically switch between the two options. When you select "commit staged" or "commit all" from the popup-menu it would select/unselect that checkbox as appropriate. Would that work? The "add to revision" popup menu option would do the staging (maybe the menu could read "add to revision" on untracked files and "stage changes" on tracked files but would be doing the same thing (git-add) in both instances. -- Drew On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: > Whether or not the unstaged modifications get committed along with the file addition depends on what kind of commit you do. If you do a plain commit without -a and without explicit pathnames, the unstaged modifications won't be committed. The same holds for files that are not newly added - if you modify a file, stage it, and modify it again, there are two different sets of changes that could be committed, based on your options to git commit. > > So this is a more general problem of what to display when a file differs between head, stage, and working directory. We could put a precedence on statuses, so added or modified would supersede modified [unstaged]. Unless you're explicitly committing only what's in your index, that's probably all you care about. I think that's basically what you said, right? > > This made me realize a bigger problem with the dialog. Committing with the 'staged only' option should really do the equivalent of a commit with no options and no explicit paths, since that's the only way to commit just the staged modifications. This means that you *can't* mess with the selections in the staged-only list. > > In addition, perhaps we should consider adding a new decorator icon to indicate files that differ from their contents in stage. In svn or cvs the concept of 'dirty' just means different from the repository, but in git there are really two kinds of dirty.. dirty with respect to the repo and dirty with respect to stage. I think it would be helpful to indicate both of them differently. > > Michelle > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Andrew Case <ac...@co...> > Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:53 pm > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Commit question > To: Michelle S Osborne <ms...@ny...> > Cc: git...@li... > >> When you commit a file managed by git after it has been "added with >> unstaged modifications" it just commits it as a standard add >> (including >> the modifications). If we treat files that show up in both "added >> (staged)" and "unstaged modifications" as if the file was simply in >> "added >> (and staged)" is this a problem? >> >> -- >> Drew >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: >> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> Paul posted a bug which turns out to be interesting because I'm not >> sure >>> what the desired functionality is. The bug is that if you add a file >> and >>> then further modify it before committing, it will turn up in the >> list of >>> files to commit twice, once as added and once as modified/unstaged. >> The >>> reason for this is because javagit returns the file as both added >> and >>> modified/unstaged, which in turn is because git status lists the >> file >>> twice in the same fashion. >>> >>> One solution would be to list the file as 'added with unstaged >>> modifications' or something like that. The thing that's slightly >> weird >>> about that is that you'd see the file listed with a different status >> >>> depending on which radio button was selected - the 'staged only' >> button >>> would show the file only as added, because if you're only committing >> >>> staged changes you won't commit the modification. The 'all changes' >> and >>> 'selected' radio buttons would show it as 'added with unstaged >>> modifications'. >>> >>> Another option is to leave it as is, so that the 'staged only' >> button >>> would just list the file as 'added', while the other two buttons >> would >>> show two files with different statuses. That's also slightly weird >> in >>> that it would probably appear to be a bug, except maybe to people >> who >>> are very familiar with git command line responses. Perhaps there's >> some >>> description that could be put into the table header or somewhere >> else in >>> the dialog that would make it clear why there were duplicate files >>> listed? >>> >>> I'm not sure if there are better options that I'm missing. Any >>> suggestions? >>> >>> Michelle >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >> great prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >> the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >>> Git...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >>> > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-31 04:29:05
|
So now that GitMoveDeleteHook is working, I was wondering if anyone knows how to hook into Undo or where to start looking for this? Currently if I delete a file, and then undo it, git still thinks the file is staged for deletion and that there is a new untracked file in it's place. -- Drew |
|
From: Michelle S O. <ms...@ny...> - 2008-07-31 02:27:47
|
Whether or not the unstaged modifications get committed along with the file addition depends on what kind of commit you do. If you do a plain commit without -a and without explicit pathnames, the unstaged modifications won't be committed. The same holds for files that are not newly added - if you modify a file, stage it, and modify it again, there are two different sets of changes that could be committed, based on your options to git commit. So this is a more general problem of what to display when a file differs between head, stage, and working directory. We could put a precedence on statuses, so added or modified would supersede modified [unstaged]. Unless you're explicitly committing only what's in your index, that's probably all you care about. I think that's basically what you said, right? This made me realize a bigger problem with the dialog. Committing with the 'staged only' option should really do the equivalent of a commit with no options and no explicit paths, since that's the only way to commit just the staged modifications. This means that you *can't* mess with the selections in the staged-only list. In addition, perhaps we should consider adding a new decorator icon to indicate files that differ from their contents in stage. In svn or cvs the concept of 'dirty' just means different from the repository, but in git there are really two kinds of dirty.. dirty with respect to the repo and dirty with respect to stage. I think it would be helpful to indicate both of them differently. Michelle ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Case <ac...@co...> Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:53 pm Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Commit question To: Michelle S Osborne <ms...@ny...> Cc: git...@li... > When you commit a file managed by git after it has been "added with > unstaged modifications" it just commits it as a standard add > (including > the modifications). If we treat files that show up in both "added > (staged)" and "unstaged modifications" as if the file was simply in > "added > (and staged)" is this a problem? > > -- > Drew > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > Paul posted a bug which turns out to be interesting because I'm not > sure > > what the desired functionality is. The bug is that if you add a file > and > > then further modify it before committing, it will turn up in the > list of > > files to commit twice, once as added and once as modified/unstaged. > The > > reason for this is because javagit returns the file as both added > and > > modified/unstaged, which in turn is because git status lists the > file > > twice in the same fashion. > > > > One solution would be to list the file as 'added with unstaged > > modifications' or something like that. The thing that's slightly > weird > > about that is that you'd see the file listed with a different status > > > depending on which radio button was selected - the 'staged only' > button > > would show the file only as added, because if you're only committing > > > staged changes you won't commit the modification. The 'all changes' > and > > 'selected' radio buttons would show it as 'added with unstaged > > modifications'. > > > > Another option is to leave it as is, so that the 'staged only' > button > > would just list the file as 'added', while the other two buttons > would > > show two files with different statuses. That's also slightly weird > in > > that it would probably appear to be a bug, except maybe to people > who > > are very familiar with git command line responses. Perhaps there's > some > > description that could be put into the table header or somewhere > else in > > the dialog that would make it clear why there were duplicate files > > listed? > > > > I'm not sure if there are better options that I'm missing. Any > > suggestions? > > > > Michelle > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the world > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > Git...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-31 02:11:04
|
You can even have a modified staged and modified unstaged at the same time which gets even more confusing for the user. # On branch master # Changes to be committed: # (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage) # # modified: src/edu/nyu/cs/hello/Hello.java # # Changed but not updated: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # # modified: src/edu/nyu/cs/hello/Hello.java # -- Drew On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Andrew Case wrote: > Nope, I'm wrong. I must have run commit -a. We have the same problem > after a git-mv and then modified. > > -- > Drew > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Andrew Case wrote: > >> When you commit a file managed by git after it has been "added with unstaged >> modifications" it just commits it as a standard add (including the >> modifications). If we treat files that show up in both "added (staged)" and >> "unstaged modifications" as if the file was simply in "added (and staged)" is >> this a problem? >> >> -- >> Drew >> >> >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: >> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> Paul posted a bug which turns out to be interesting because I'm not sure >>> what the desired functionality is. The bug is that if you add a file and >>> then further modify it before committing, it will turn up in the list of >>> files to commit twice, once as added and once as modified/unstaged. The >>> reason for this is because javagit returns the file as both added and >>> modified/unstaged, which in turn is because git status lists the file twice >>> in the same fashion. >>> >>> One solution would be to list the file as 'added with unstaged >>> modifications' or something like that. The thing that's slightly weird >>> about that is that you'd see the file listed with a different status >>> depending on which radio button was selected - the 'staged only' button >>> would show the file only as added, because if you're only committing staged >>> changes you won't commit the modification. The 'all changes' and 'selected' >>> radio buttons would show it as 'added with unstaged modifications'. >>> >>> Another option is to leave it as is, so that the 'staged only' button would >>> just list the file as 'added', while the other two buttons would show two >>> files with different statuses. That's also slightly weird in that it would >>> probably appear to be a bug, except maybe to people who are very familiar >>> with git command line responses. Perhaps there's some description that >>> could be put into the table header or somewhere else in the dialog that >>> would make it clear why there were duplicate files listed? >>> >>> I'm not sure if there are better options that I'm missing. Any suggestions? >>> >>> Michelle >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >>> Git...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >>> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-31 02:07:48
|
Nope, I'm wrong. I must have run commit -a. We have the same problem after a git-mv and then modified. -- Drew On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Andrew Case wrote: > When you commit a file managed by git after it has been "added with unstaged > modifications" it just commits it as a standard add (including the > modifications). If we treat files that show up in both "added (staged)" and > "unstaged modifications" as if the file was simply in "added (and staged)" is > this a problem? > > -- > Drew > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Paul posted a bug which turns out to be interesting because I'm not sure >> what the desired functionality is. The bug is that if you add a file and >> then further modify it before committing, it will turn up in the list of >> files to commit twice, once as added and once as modified/unstaged. The >> reason for this is because javagit returns the file as both added and >> modified/unstaged, which in turn is because git status lists the file twice >> in the same fashion. >> >> One solution would be to list the file as 'added with unstaged >> modifications' or something like that. The thing that's slightly weird >> about that is that you'd see the file listed with a different status >> depending on which radio button was selected - the 'staged only' button >> would show the file only as added, because if you're only committing staged >> changes you won't commit the modification. The 'all changes' and 'selected' >> radio buttons would show it as 'added with unstaged modifications'. >> >> Another option is to leave it as is, so that the 'staged only' button would >> just list the file as 'added', while the other two buttons would show two >> files with different statuses. That's also slightly weird in that it would >> probably appear to be a bug, except maybe to people who are very familiar >> with git command line responses. Perhaps there's some description that >> could be put into the table header or somewhere else in the dialog that >> would make it clear why there were duplicate files listed? >> >> I'm not sure if there are better options that I'm missing. Any suggestions? >> >> Michelle >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >> Git...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >> > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-31 01:52:50
|
When you commit a file managed by git after it has been "added with unstaged modifications" it just commits it as a standard add (including the modifications). If we treat files that show up in both "added (staged)" and "unstaged modifications" as if the file was simply in "added (and staged)" is this a problem? -- Drew On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: > Hey guys, > > Paul posted a bug which turns out to be interesting because I'm not sure > what the desired functionality is. The bug is that if you add a file and > then further modify it before committing, it will turn up in the list of > files to commit twice, once as added and once as modified/unstaged. The > reason for this is because javagit returns the file as both added and > modified/unstaged, which in turn is because git status lists the file > twice in the same fashion. > > One solution would be to list the file as 'added with unstaged > modifications' or something like that. The thing that's slightly weird > about that is that you'd see the file listed with a different status > depending on which radio button was selected - the 'staged only' button > would show the file only as added, because if you're only committing > staged changes you won't commit the modification. The 'all changes' and > 'selected' radio buttons would show it as 'added with unstaged > modifications'. > > Another option is to leave it as is, so that the 'staged only' button > would just list the file as 'added', while the other two buttons would > show two files with different statuses. That's also slightly weird in > that it would probably appear to be a bug, except maybe to people who > are very familiar with git command line responses. Perhaps there's some > description that could be put into the table header or somewhere else in > the dialog that would make it clear why there were duplicate files > listed? > > I'm not sure if there are better options that I'm missing. Any > suggestions? > > Michelle > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > |
|
From: Michelle S O. <ms...@ny...> - 2008-07-31 01:24:41
|
Hey guys, Paul posted a bug which turns out to be interesting because I'm not sure what the desired functionality is. The bug is that if you add a file and then further modify it before committing, it will turn up in the list of files to commit twice, once as added and once as modified/unstaged. The reason for this is because javagit returns the file as both added and modified/unstaged, which in turn is because git status lists the file twice in the same fashion. One solution would be to list the file as 'added with unstaged modifications' or something like that. The thing that's slightly weird about that is that you'd see the file listed with a different status depending on which radio button was selected - the 'staged only' button would show the file only as added, because if you're only committing staged changes you won't commit the modification. The 'all changes' and 'selected' radio buttons would show it as 'added with unstaged modifications'. Another option is to leave it as is, so that the 'staged only' button would just list the file as 'added', while the other two buttons would show two files with different statuses. That's also slightly weird in that it would probably appear to be a bug, except maybe to people who are very familiar with git command line responses. Perhaps there's some description that could be put into the table header or somewhere else in the dialog that would make it clear why there were duplicate files listed? I'm not sure if there are better options that I'm missing. Any suggestions? Michelle |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-30 20:14:36
|
We should really be moving almost all of the wiki information over to sourceforge. Unfortunately, the wiki needs to be up for us to get that info. -- Drew On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Paul Munson Bethe wrote: > > The wiki is down again, and I can't remember exactly how to do > testing... can we copy a 'testing set-up' page to our sourceforge home? > > -P > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > |
|
From: Paul M. B. <pm...@ny...> - 2008-07-30 20:00:31
|
The wiki is down again, and I can't remember exactly how to do testing... can we copy a 'testing set-up' page to our sourceforge home? -P |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-29 20:36:33
|
I don't see any. Server problems maybe. Do you still see them? -- Drew On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Paul Munson Bethe wrote: > Has anyone tried the sourceforge home page recently: > > http://gitclipse.sourceforge.net/ > > Produces several php warnings... Andrew? > |
|
From: <pm...@ny...> - 2008-07-29 17:08:07
|
... Weird. It works now. ------Original Message------ From: Andrew Case To: Paul Munson Bethe Cc: gitclipse-devel Sent: Jul 29, 2008 12:56 PM Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] [Gitclipse-build] Broken build I don't see any. Server problems maybe. Do you still see them? -- Drew On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Paul Munson Bethe wrote: > Has anyone tried the sourceforge home page recently: > > http://gitclipse.sourceforge.net/ > > Produces several php warnings... Andrew? > Sent via BlackBerry |
|
From: Paul M. B. <pm...@ny...> - 2008-07-29 16:31:15
|
Has anyone tried the sourceforge home page recently: http://gitclipse.sourceforge.net/ Produces several php warnings... Andrew? |
|
From: Han C. <dev...@gm...> - 2008-07-29 02:45:12
|
I am getting a lot of error when starting up our app, it looks like Eclipse couldn't find the GitUIActivator, GitProviderPlugin. is anyone else having the same problem? -- Han Chiu |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-29 01:03:15
|
You can change it however you want as long as it works I don't care. I changed it because the way it was wasn't working (I actually made the commit before I got your email) becuase from what I could tell, there wasn't a javagit-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar file and that's what was being looked for. Something not mentioned earlier was that the .classpath file needs to be set to whatever the .jar is called too. Do it however you want, as long as it works (it works currently). -- Drew On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: > I had fixed it right after I sent that email. Why are we changing the > references back again? It doesn't matter what the name of the file is, as > long as we're consistent with it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Andrew Case <ac...@co...> > Date: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:55 pm > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-build] Broken build > To: Michelle S Osborne <ms...@ny...> > Cc: Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...>, > git...@li... > >> Already fixed. Maybe you want to fix it a different way though. I >> changed all the references in .classpath, MANIFEST.MF, and >> build.properties to use "javagit.jar" instead of >> "javagit-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar". It works. The catch... >> >> Everyone will have to rename their javagit-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar to >> javagit.jar in their edu.nyu.cs.javagit directories. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> Drew >> >> >> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: >> >>> Okay, I will fix this as soon as I get a chance. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...> >>> Date: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:41 pm >>> Subject: RE: [Gitclipse-build] Broken build >>> To: 'Michelle S Osborne' <ms...@ny...>, 'Andrew Case' >>> <ac...@co...> >>> Cc: git...@li... >>> >>> >>>> Look at line 6 of the javagit plug-ins manifest. >>>> http://linserv3.cims.nyu.edu:11000/browse/OSP/gitclipse/trunk/edu.nyu.cs.jav >>>> agit/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF?r=525#l6 >>>> >>>> The plug-in is explicitly exporting "javagit-0.01-SNAPSHOT.jar" on >> its >>>> classpath. If this isn't the filename when it's inside the project, >>>> it will >>>> probably try and build, but won't find any javagit classes. >>>> >>>> We could change the name once it's in the project to just be "javagit.jar" >>>> and update the manifest. But James tells me this filename won't >>>> change for >>>> a long time. The other option is to extract the classes from the jar >>>> into a >>>> "bin" folder so we don't have any explicit filename references. >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- >>>>> bui...@li...] On Behalf Of Michelle S Osborne >>>>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:24 PM >>>>> To: Andrew Case >>>>> Cc: git...@li... >>>>> Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-build] Broken build >>>>> >>>>> It's not named javagit-0.01-SNAPSHOT.jar. I thought we had the build >>>>> set up so that the name of the jar file didn't matter, as long as >> the >>>>> javagitJar property points to the correct jar. If that's not the case >>>>> let me know and I will change it. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure what version I'm up to on my machine, but I know at some >>>>> point last night I was able to build. I happen to have the jar file >>>>> named javagit-0.01-SNAPSHOT.jar though, so that doesn't prove anything. >>>>> >>>>> Stupid question, but when you change the name of the jarfile on your >>>>> machine do you also change the value of the javagitJar property in >>>>> build.local.properties? >>>>> >>>>> Michelle >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Andrew Case <ac...@co...> >>>>> Date: Monday, July 28, 2008 11:14 am >>>>> Subject: Re: Broken build >>>>> To: Michelle S Osborne <ms...@ny...> >>>>> Cc: git...@li... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm... I wonder what it's problem is. From the logs I see >>>>>> >>>>>> Copying /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/javagit.jar to >>>>>> /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- >>>>> build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.javagit/javagit.jar >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you copying javagit.jar to javagit-0.01-SNAPSHOT.jar or does >> this >>>>>> not >>>>>> need to happen? On my computer if it's not named >>>>>> javagit-0.01-SNAPSHOT.jar the build fails (this would have been >>>>>> failing >>>>>> all along though in that case). >>>>>> >>>>>> If you get the updated MoveDeleteHook.java does it build on your >>>>> machine? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Drew >>>>>> >>>>>> P.S. Moving this to the proper list. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It's already doing that.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>> From: Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...> >>>>>>> Date: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:48 pm >>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build >>>>>>> To: 'Michelle S Osborne' <ms...@ny...>, 'gitclipse-devel' >>>>> <git...@li...> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Michelle, >>>>>>>> For the time being can you have the javagit build run "mvn >>>>> package" >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> point the gitclipse jar property to the one created by them? This >>>>>> way >>>>>>>> we'll >>>>>>>> stay up-to-date. >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Patrick >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: git...@li... >>>>> [mailto:gitclipse- >>>>>>>>> dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick Winters >>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:38 PM >>>>>>>>> To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I take this back, I might have an old javagit jar. We don't have >>>>>>>>> Cruise >>>>>>>>> Control staying up-to-date with javagit yet. I e-mailed them >>>>> about >>>>>>>>> publishing their nightly builds somewhere so we can download them >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> copy >>>>>>>>> into our build. We didn't think it would be smart for us to be >>>>> running >>>>>>>>> their build script within ours. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> From: git...@li... >>>>>>>>> [mailto:gitclipse- >>>>>>>>>> dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick >>>>> Winters >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:26 PM >>>>>>>>>> To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I just updated my projects, and the only build problem I see >>>>> here >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>> incorrect import. In GitMoveDeleteHook you imported the >>>>>>>>>> "edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.commands.GitStatus" but you are trying >>>>> to >>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>> methods that belong to the temporary placeholder >>>>>>>>>> "edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core.internal.GitStatus" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't have the import error you mention. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>> From: git...@li... >>>>>>>>>> [mailto:gitclipse- >>>>>>>>>>> dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM >>>>>>>>>>> To: gitclipse-devel >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Michelle/Patrick, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> javagit >>>>>>>>>>> API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to >>>>> be >>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building >>>>> edu.nyu.cs.javagit? >>>>>>>>>> Is >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what >>>>> seems >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> missing here? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Build log snippet >>>>>>>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>> <message priority="info"> >>>>>>>>>>> [javac] 1. ERROR in >>>>>>>>>>> /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G >>>>>>>>>>> itMoveDeleteHook.java >>>>>>>>>>> (at line 15) >>>>>>>>>>> </message> >>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>> <message priority="info"> >>>>>>>>>>> [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; >>>>>>>>>>> </message> >>>>>>>>>>> <message priority="info">[javac] >>>>>>>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> >>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>> <message priority="info"> >>>>>>>>>>> [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved >>>>>>>>>>> </message> >>>>>>>>>>> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >>>>>>>>>>> <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I just can't find the import >>>>>>>>> edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Drew >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move >>>>> Developer's >>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & >>>>> win >>>>>>>>>> great >>>>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere >>>>> in >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Git...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move >>>>> Developer's >>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & >>>> win >>>>>>>>> great >>>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere >>>>> in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Git...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move >>>>> Developer's >>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>> great >>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere >>>> in >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> Git...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> ------ >>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>> challenge >>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>> the world >>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >>>>>>> Git...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> -- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>> challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>> prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >> the >>>>> world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Gitclipse-build mailing list >>>>> Git...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-build >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >> great prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >> the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gitclipse-build mailing list >>> Git...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-build >>> > |
|
From: Michelle S O. <ms...@ny...> - 2008-07-28 13:24:39
|
It's already doing that.. ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Winters <pat...@ny...> Date: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:48 pm Subject: RE: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build To: 'Michelle S Osborne' <ms...@ny...>, 'gitclipse-devel' <git...@li...> > Michelle, > For the time being can you have the javagit build run "mvn package" > and > point the gitclipse jar property to the one created by them? This way > we'll > stay up-to-date. > -- > Patrick > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- > > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick Winters > > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:38 PM > > To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' > > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > > > I take this back, I might have an old javagit jar. We don't have > > Cruise > > Control staying up-to-date with javagit yet. I e-mailed them about > > publishing their nightly builds somewhere so we can download them to > > copy > > into our build. We didn't think it would be smart for us to be running > > their build script within ours. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: git...@li... > > [mailto:gitclipse- > > > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick Winters > > > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:26 PM > > > To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' > > > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > > > > > I just updated my projects, and the only build problem I see here > is > > an > > > incorrect import. In GitMoveDeleteHook you imported the > > > "edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.commands.GitStatus" but you are trying to > use > > > methods that belong to the temporary placeholder > > > "edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core.internal.GitStatus" > > > > > > I don't have the import error you mention. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: git...@li... > > > [mailto:gitclipse- > > > > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case > > > > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM > > > > To: gitclipse-devel > > > > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > > > > > > > Michelle/Patrick, > > > > > > > > It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the > > > > javagit > > > > API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be > > able > > > > to > > > > find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? > > > Is > > > > the > > > > jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems > to > > > be > > > > missing here? > > > > > > > > Build log snippet > > > > ----------------- > > > > > > > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > > > > - > > > > <message priority="info"> > > > > [javac] 1. ERROR in > > > > /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- > > > > > > > > > build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G > > > > itMoveDeleteHook.java > > > > (at line 15) > > > > </message> > > > > - > > > > <message priority="info"> > > > > [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; > > > > </message> > > > > <message priority="info">[javac] > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> > > > > - > > > > <message priority="info"> > > > > [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved > > > > </message> > > > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > > > > <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> > > > > > > > > > > > > I just can't find the import > > edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Drew > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > -- > > > > -- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > > > > challenge > > > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > > > great > > > > prizes > > > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > > the > > > > world > > > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > > > Git...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > -- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > > > challenge > > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > > great > > > prizes > > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the > > > world > > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > > Git...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > > challenge > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > > prizes > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > > world > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > Git...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-28 07:55:15
|
Yeah, no problem. If you check it out can you (after you compile and include javagit's jar into the edu.nyu.cs.javagit plugin of course)? -- Drew On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Michelle S Osborne wrote: > The javagit jar is being copied to the correction location in the build directory. Can you run the build locally? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Andrew Case <ac...@co...> > Date: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 pm > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > To: gitclipse-devel <git...@li...> > >> Michelle/Patrick, >> >> It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the >> javagit >> API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be able >> to >> find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Is >> the >> jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems to be >> >> missing here? >> >> Build log snippet >> ----------------- >> >> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >> - >> <message priority="info"> >> [javac] 1. ERROR in >> /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse-build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/GitMoveDeleteHook.java >> >> (at line 15) >> </message> >> - >> <message priority="info"> >> [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; >> </message> >> <message priority="info">[javac] >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> >> - >> <message priority="info"> >> [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved >> </message> >> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >> <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> >> >> >> I just can't find the import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Drew >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >> Git...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-28 07:47:06
|
I did what you suggested and commited the edu.nyu.cs.javagit MANAFEST.MF changes wit "Calculate Uses". It works fine on my side (either way). But there is no change (still broken) on CC. I'm still thinking it's a problem getting to jar in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit plugin. -- Drew > Open the manifest for the javagit project and in the Runtime tab try > clicking "Calculate Uses". I don't know if this is necessary but it > resolves some build error for me in the IDE. I'll let you commit it. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- >> dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case >> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM >> To: gitclipse-devel >> Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build >> >> Michelle/Patrick, >> >> It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the >> javagit >> API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be able >> to >> find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Is >> the >> jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems to be >> missing here? >> >> Build log snippet >> ----------------- >> >> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >> - >> <message priority="info"> >> [javac] 1. ERROR in >> /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- >> build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G >> itMoveDeleteHook.java >> (at line 15) >> </message> >> - >> <message priority="info"> >> [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; >> </message> >> <message priority="info">[javac] >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> >> - >> <message priority="info"> >> [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved >> </message> >> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >> <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> >> >> >> I just can't find the import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Drew >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >> Git...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > |
|
From: Andrew C. <ac...@co...> - 2008-07-28 07:44:46
|
Right, as you corrected, my calls aren't to .internal, but javagit.api.commands which is legit. I think it's a problem on the build side. I'll pull my changes out if necessary, but I think the problem is on the build side and we won't make any progress forward at this point if this doesn't get corrected and we can't compile against javagit, so I think my changes should stand and the build process should be corrected. Do we need nightly builds? I guess that's one route. Since we're both using the same build framework, can Michelle just have their .jar file copied over after any successful build on their part? If their build is broken the jar won't be there, so nothing broken will be copied over. -- Drew On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Patrick Winters wrote: > I take this back, I might have an old javagit jar. We don't have Cruise > Control staying up-to-date with javagit yet. I e-mailed them about > publishing their nightly builds somewhere so we can download them to copy > into our build. We didn't think it would be smart for us to be running > their build script within ours. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- >> dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick Winters >> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:26 PM >> To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' >> Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build >> >> I just updated my projects, and the only build problem I see here is an >> incorrect import. In GitMoveDeleteHook you imported the >> "edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.commands.GitStatus" but you are trying to use >> methods that belong to the temporary placeholder >> "edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core.internal.GitStatus" >> >> I don't have the import error you mention. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: git...@li... >> [mailto:gitclipse- >>> dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case >>> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM >>> To: gitclipse-devel >>> Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build >>> >>> Michelle/Patrick, >>> >>> It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the >>> javagit >>> API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be able >>> to >>> find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? >> Is >>> the >>> jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems to >> be >>> missing here? >>> >>> Build log snippet >>> ----------------- >>> >>> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >>> - >>> <message priority="info"> >>> [javac] 1. ERROR in >>> /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- >>> >> build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G >>> itMoveDeleteHook.java >>> (at line 15) >>> </message> >>> - >>> <message priority="info"> >>> [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; >>> </message> >>> <message priority="info">[javac] >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> >>> - >>> <message priority="info"> >>> [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved >>> </message> >>> <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> >>> <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> >>> >>> >>> I just can't find the import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- >>> Drew >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >>> -- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >> great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>> world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >>> Git...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Gitclipse-devel mailing list >> Git...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > |
|
From: Patrick W. <pat...@ny...> - 2008-07-28 03:47:52
|
Michelle, For the time being can you have the javagit build run "mvn package" and point the gitclipse jar property to the one created by them? This way we'll stay up-to-date. -- Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick Winters > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:38 PM > To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > I take this back, I might have an old javagit jar. We don't have > Cruise > Control staying up-to-date with javagit yet. I e-mailed them about > publishing their nightly builds somewhere so we can download them to > copy > into our build. We didn't think it would be smart for us to be running > their build script within ours. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: git...@li... > [mailto:gitclipse- > > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick Winters > > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:26 PM > > To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' > > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > > > I just updated my projects, and the only build problem I see here is > an > > incorrect import. In GitMoveDeleteHook you imported the > > "edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.commands.GitStatus" but you are trying to use > > methods that belong to the temporary placeholder > > "edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core.internal.GitStatus" > > > > I don't have the import error you mention. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: git...@li... > > [mailto:gitclipse- > > > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case > > > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM > > > To: gitclipse-devel > > > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > > > > > Michelle/Patrick, > > > > > > It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the > > > javagit > > > API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be > able > > > to > > > find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? > > Is > > > the > > > jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems to > > be > > > missing here? > > > > > > Build log snippet > > > ----------------- > > > > > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > > > - > > > <message priority="info"> > > > [javac] 1. ERROR in > > > /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- > > > > > > build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G > > > itMoveDeleteHook.java > > > (at line 15) > > > </message> > > > - > > > <message priority="info"> > > > [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; > > > </message> > > > <message priority="info">[javac] > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> > > > - > > > <message priority="info"> > > > [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved > > > </message> > > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > > > <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> > > > > > > > > > I just can't find the import > edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Drew > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > -- > > > -- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > > > challenge > > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > > great > > > prizes > > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the > > > world > > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > > Git...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > -- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > > challenge > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great > > prizes > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > > world > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > Git...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel |
|
From: Patrick W. <pat...@ny...> - 2008-07-28 03:45:13
|
Open the manifest for the javagit project and in the Runtime tab try clicking "Calculate Uses". I don't know if this is necessary but it resolves some build error for me in the IDE. I'll let you commit it. > -----Original Message----- > From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM > To: gitclipse-devel > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > Michelle/Patrick, > > It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the > javagit > API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be able > to > find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Is > the > jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems to be > missing here? > > Build log snippet > ----------------- > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > - > <message priority="info"> > [javac] 1. ERROR in > /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- > build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G > itMoveDeleteHook.java > (at line 15) > </message> > - > <message priority="info"> > [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; > </message> > <message priority="info">[javac] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> > - > <message priority="info"> > [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved > </message> > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> > > > I just can't find the import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. > > Thanks, > > -- > Drew > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel |
|
From: Patrick W. <pat...@ny...> - 2008-07-28 03:38:25
|
I take this back, I might have an old javagit jar. We don't have Cruise Control staying up-to-date with javagit yet. I e-mailed them about publishing their nightly builds somewhere so we can download them to copy into our build. We didn't think it would be smart for us to be running their build script within ours. > -----Original Message----- > From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Patrick Winters > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:26 PM > To: 'Andrew Case'; 'gitclipse-devel' > Subject: Re: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > I just updated my projects, and the only build problem I see here is an > incorrect import. In GitMoveDeleteHook you imported the > "edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.commands.GitStatus" but you are trying to use > methods that belong to the temporary placeholder > "edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core.internal.GitStatus" > > I don't have the import error you mention. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: git...@li... > [mailto:gitclipse- > > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case > > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM > > To: gitclipse-devel > > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > > > Michelle/Patrick, > > > > It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the > > javagit > > API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be able > > to > > find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? > Is > > the > > jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems to > be > > missing here? > > > > Build log snippet > > ----------------- > > > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > > - > > <message priority="info"> > > [javac] 1. ERROR in > > /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- > > > build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G > > itMoveDeleteHook.java > > (at line 15) > > </message> > > - > > <message priority="info"> > > [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; > > </message> > > <message priority="info">[javac] > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> > > - > > <message priority="info"> > > [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved > > </message> > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > > <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> > > > > > > I just can't find the import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Drew > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > -- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > > challenge > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great > > prizes > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > > world > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > > Git...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel |
|
From: Patrick W. <pat...@ny...> - 2008-07-28 03:26:18
|
I just updated my projects, and the only build problem I see here is an incorrect import. In GitMoveDeleteHook you imported the "edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.commands.GitStatus" but you are trying to use methods that belong to the temporary placeholder "edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core.internal.GitStatus" I don't have the import error you mention. > -----Original Message----- > From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Andrew Case > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:27 PM > To: gitclipse-devel > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Broken build > > Michelle/Patrick, > > It looks like I'm the first one to commit some code that uses the > javagit > API. It seems to have broken the build as CC doesn't seem to be able > to > find edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.*. Is CC building edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Is > the > jar included in the edu.nyu.cs.javagit? Any ideas on what seems to be > missing here? > > Build log snippet > ----------------- > > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > - > <message priority="info"> > [javac] 1. ERROR in > /home/mso206/cruisecontrol/gitclipse- > build/plugins/edu.nyu.cs.gitclipse.core/src/edu/nyu/cs/gitclipse/core/G > itMoveDeleteHook.java > (at line 15) > </message> > - > <message priority="info"> > [javac] import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException; > </message> > <message priority="info">[javac] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^</message> > - > <message priority="info"> > [javac] The import edu.nyu.cs.javagit cannot be resolved > </message> > <message priority="info">[javac] ----------</message> > <message priority="warn">BUILD FAILED</message> > > > I just can't find the import edu.nyu.cs.javagit.api.JavaGitException. > > Thanks, > > -- > Drew > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel |
|
From: Patrick W. <pat...@ny...> - 2008-07-28 03:15:35
|
In the future you can just do a Project > Clean and it will completely rebuild any projects you want. > -----Original Message----- > From: git...@li... [mailto:gitclipse- > dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Michelle S Osborne > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:39 PM > To: gitclipse-devel > Subject: [Gitclipse-devel] Problems with Eclipse > > Hey guys, > > A word of warning.. I just manually deleted the bin directories > underneath the ui and core projects because I was worried that they > were stale, and all hell broke loose in Eclipse. I think what happened > was it didn't think anything needed to be compiled because the files > hadn't been modified, so 'Build all' and 'Build project' had no effect. > I had to start modifying files in order to convince Eclipse to compile > those files, then try building again to see how many more class files > would appear, then modify some more classes, etc.. it ended up taking > just over an hour to resolve. So in short.. don't screw with your bin > directories. > > I also still can't get my test project to associate with gitclipse. > Team -> Share Project -> Git still causes a NullPointerException. Is > there anything else I can try? I can't check this stuff in until I test > commit out again, since I've changed a huge amount of code around. > > Michelle > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Gitclipse-devel mailing list > Git...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gitclipse-devel |
