You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(412) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(187) |
May
(377) |
Jun
(355) |
Jul
(129) |
Aug
(316) |
Sep
(412) |
Oct
(258) |
Nov
(260) |
Dec
(228) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(291) |
Feb
(497) |
Mar
(341) |
Apr
(105) |
May
(127) |
Jun
(97) |
Jul
(348) |
Aug
(195) |
Sep
(353) |
Oct
(516) |
Nov
(454) |
Dec
(99) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(125) |
Feb
(232) |
Mar
(222) |
Apr
(160) |
May
(147) |
Jun
(97) |
Jul
(199) |
Aug
(275) |
Sep
(411) |
Oct
(355) |
Nov
(371) |
Dec
(326) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(314) |
Feb
(181) |
Mar
(166) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(192) |
Jun
(137) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(59) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(202) |
Dec
(158) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(142) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(190) |
Jun
(245) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(199) |
Sep
(182) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(285) |
Dec
(173) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(74) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(275) |
May
(133) |
Jun
(106) |
Jul
(215) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(131) |
Oct
(135) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(76) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(173) |
Feb
(96) |
Mar
(127) |
Apr
(226) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(101) |
Aug
(122) |
Sep
(118) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(58) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(204) |
Feb
(137) |
Mar
(115) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(135) |
Jun
(111) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(77) |
Dec
(145) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(159) |
Feb
(52) |
Mar
(77) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(105) |
Jul
(119) |
Aug
(225) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(173) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(94) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(50) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(74) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(95) |
Nov
(132) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(73) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(74) |
Sep
(117) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(42) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(121) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(142) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(130) |
Dec
(63) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(63) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(86) |
Aug
(91) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(95) |
Nov
(130) |
Dec
(117) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(283) |
Feb
(206) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(36) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(70) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(184) |
Oct
(157) |
Nov
(91) |
Dec
(90) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(89) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(57) |
Apr
(86) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(71) |
Aug
(60) |
Sep
(207) |
Oct
(139) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(68) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(91) |
Mar
(138) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(105) |
Aug
(71) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(114) |
Nov
(148) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(118) |
Feb
(107) |
Mar
(111) |
Apr
(127) |
May
(60) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(49) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(134) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(91) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(81) |
Jul
(53) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(62) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(57) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(139) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(117) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|
From: Andy T. <th...@ph...> - 2000-02-04 10:06:32
|
Just committed my newest version of the canon driver which should now support
the models
BJC 1000
BJC 2000
BJC 3000
BJC 6000
BJC 6100
BJC 7000 (except 7color)
BJC 7100 (except 7color)
I invite everyone to test the driver extensively, play with density and gamma
values and send reports to me.
I know the colors are looking quite terrible at the moment, but first of all
I'd like to get reports if the various models do print at all. The driver
seems to work fne with my bjc6000 - so much I can say.
May the development release come :-)
Andy.
|
|
From: <sh...@al...> - 2000-02-04 03:46:43
|
> It doesn't work for me. Perhaps I have an old version of autoconf?
>
> [2(rlk)||{!600}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
> $ autoconf
> [2(rlk)||{!601}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
> $ ./configure
> loading site script /usr/local/share/config.site
> Processing GNUstep site configuration
> creating cache ./config.cache
> ./configure: line 526: syntax error near unexpected token `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(p
> rint,'
Did you run "aclocal" first?
I'll write a build script tonight to simplify this a bit.
Eric
|
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-04 03:04:45
|
I think it's time we start thinking about what should go into the 3.1.0 development release. I'd like to do one as soon as we have something with sufficient functionality over 3.0.5 so that people would like to play with it, even though it won't be solid. My thought is that we need the following in order to do this: 1) A fully working configure script. 2) Some documentation. Once we get either Canon or newer Epson printers at least limping, it seems to me that we've made the functionality bar. Anyone have any strong feelings on this? We should release sooner, we should wait longer...? -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-04 01:31:31
|
It doesn't work for me. Perhaps I have an old version of autoconf?
[2(rlk)||{!600}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
$ autoconf
[2(rlk)||{!601}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
$ ./configure
loading site script /usr/local/share/config.site
Processing GNUstep site configuration
creating cache ./config.cache
./configure: line 526: syntax error near unexpected token `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(print,'
./configure: line 526: `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(print, 3.1.0, no-define)'
[2(rlk)||{!602}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
$ autoconf
[2(rlk)||{!603}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
$ !./
./configure
loading site script /usr/local/share/config.site
Processing GNUstep site configuration
loading cache ./config.cache
./configure: line 526: syntax error near unexpected token `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE($PACKAGE,'
./configure: line 526: `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE($PACKAGE, $VERSION, no-define)'
[2(rlk)||{!604}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
$ autoconf --help
Usage: autoconf [-h] [--help] [-m dir] [--macrodir=dir]
[-l dir] [--localdir=dir] [--version] [template-file]
[2(rlk)||{!605}<rlkppp>/mnt/sandbox/gimp-print/print]
$ autoconf --version
Autoconf version 2.13
--
Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu...
Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
|
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-04 00:27:55
|
From: sh...@al... Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 00:07:00 +0900 I have to apologize. I accidently trounced on Makefile.in and Makefile during my commission. These are generated files when using autoconf. If we want to stick to using autoconf, then, these files should probably be removed from the repository entirely, since they will be generated on the fly from Makefile.am and configure.in. Well, that was my fault originally, since I'm the one who put 'em in there in the first place. Thanks for taking care of this. This stuff still needs work as not all bits of it are as elegant as they should be. |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-04 00:27:10
|
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 15:57:18 +0100 From: Andy Thaller <th...@ph...> Robert L Krawitz wrote: > I'd actually prefer something like this for other reasons, anyway -- > this would allow someone to define "virtual" printers that are really > just sets of options. So someone could define a "printer" that has > settings appropriate for highest quality printing, another one for > quick and dirty proofing, others for various groups of settings known > to work for particular images... Good point! I'll love this :-) Sounds like this might be good as part of the GUI rewrite. |
|
From: <sh...@al...> - 2000-02-03 15:08:37
|
Ok, I've made my first attempt at getting autoconf working. I committed several files which may be sufficient to compile print and unprint using autoconf. Hopefully I didn't screw anything up too badly. I have to apologize. I accidently trounced on Makefile.in and Makefile during my commission. These are generated files when using autoconf. If we want to stick to using autoconf, then, these files should probably be removed from the repository entirely, since they will be generated on the fly from Makefile.am and configure.in. This stuff still needs work as not all bits of it are as elegant as they should be. Let me know if (when?) you have problems. Eric |
|
From: Andy T. <th...@ph...> - 2000-02-03 14:54:25
|
Robert L Krawitz wrote: > Actually, that's a good point. It is appropriate for the binary to > deal with it. I wasn't thinking too clearly, and reacted out of annoyance. Annoying - that's the word I was looking for ... ;-) > I'd actually prefer something like this for other reasons, anyway -- > this would allow someone to define "virtual" printers that are really > just sets of options. So someone could define a "printer" that has > settings appropriate for highest quality printing, another one for > quick and dirty proofing, others for various groups of settings known > to work for particular images... Good point! I'll love this :-) Andy. |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 12:44:52
|
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 09:54:15 +0100 From: Andy Thaller <th...@ph...> Thanks for implementing this, I've changed the code a bit to account for the inktype setting and it works wonderful with the BJC driver. (so far I can only see this from the debug messages but I'm longingly waiting for the photo printhead I've ordered....) Does the multiple droplet stuff work (have you tried it)? -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 12:42:30
|
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 09:46:02 +0100 From: Andy Thaller <th...@ph...> Robert L Krawitz wrote: > This sort of nonsense is confusing everyone. Someone tried to > give me a patch to use "lpc status all" rather than "lpc status" > because that's what his lpc needs. This needs to be part of the > configuration process. I can't quite agree with this. I don't know what's true for other distributions than my SuSE. All I can say is you can choose between the bsd-style printing spooler and the plp spooler. To account for the unfortunate difference in the lpc-syntax there'd have to be shipped two binaries of the print-plugin if lpc-args are determined at configuration time. Of cource the choise to activate this paging stuff as default and having it deactivated optionally was not really ideal in the first place. Nevertheless the binary has to deal with the differences, IMHO. Actually, that's a good point. It is appropriate for the binary to deal with it. I wasn't thinking too clearly, and reacted out of annoyance. If we really don't want to do it the way I've inroduced with my work-around, we can still consider to supply an environment-variable PRINT_PLUGIN_LPC_OPTIONS - you name it - which is checked for by the print-plugin. Although a sort of "Preferences Dialog" would be much more sexy this solution would do for the time being. Perhaps we should leave the current track in long distance terms: Instead of offering all available printers the lpc command gives us we could have a setup dialog for adding/removing printers. The user can choose an appropriate description for the printer which will show up in the main printing dialog (being much more descriptive than /etc/printcap-names) and associates a file or print-command with it (this way we could also either print to various fixes filenames or invoke the FileChooser depending on what the user prefers). The dialog can still support the user by offering installed printers but the strong dependency from the lpc command would vanish. Of course, this is just musing and open to discussion, which is most certainly needed ;-) I'd actually prefer something like this for other reasons, anyway -- this would allow someone to define "virtual" printers that are really just sets of options. So someone could define a "printer" that has settings appropriate for highest quality printing, another one for quick and dirty proofing, others for various groups of settings known to work for particular images... -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 12:34:23
|
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 21:02:57 -0700 From: "S. Miller" <sm...@rn...> CC: th...@ph..., gim...@so... Since I'm new to both this project and open source development, can anyone help with cvs? I don't seem to have ssh1 (is there someplace that I can get it aside from ftp.cs.hut.fi, which appears to be down?), so I tried anonymous just to get the tree downloaded. Following the instructions, I got rejected: steve> cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/gimp-print login (Logging in to ano...@cv...) CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: authorization failed: server cvs.gimp-print.sourceforge.net rejected access Help? As a developer, you shouldn't use anonymous access. The correct command to use is: export CVS_RSH=ssh cvs -dsm...@cv...:/cvsroot/gimp-print co CVSROOT You do need ssh installed on your system, though -- rsh will not work. You can get freessh from www.freessh.org. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |
|
From: <sh...@al...> - 2000-02-03 09:05:37
|
> Since I'm new to both this project and open source development, can > anyone help with cvs? I don't seem to have ssh1 (is there someplace > that I can get it aside from ftp.cs.hut.fi, which appears to be down?), I recommend using the OpenSSH version. It's free. Go to www.openssh.com. > so I tried anonymous just to get the tree downloaded. Following the > instructions, I got rejected: > > steve> cvs > -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/gimp-print > login > (Logging in to ano...@cv...) > CVS password: > cvs [login aborted]: authorization failed: server > cvs.gimp-print.sourceforge.net rejected access <shrug> Did you type a password? Eric |
|
From: Andy T. <th...@ph...> - 2000-02-03 08:51:18
|
Robert L Krawitz wrote: > Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:28:40 +0100 > From: Andy Thaller <th...@ph...> > > I'm coming to a point where I'd need the possibility to choose the > installed ink cartridges in the GUI: my BJC can be equipped either > with a K/CMY combination or Kcm/CMY heads. Other printers allow > choosing between K and CMY, etc, so generalizing this would make > sense for me. I'm not too familiar with GTK so if someone offers to > change the dialog appropriately I'd concentrate on further > bjc-support. > > I went and did it, but I called it "Ink Type" rather than "Print > Head". This would be useful for other things, such as Luminos inks > for Epson printers. Luminos inks are special archival inks that are > available for some printers. They have different characteristics from > Epson inks. I'm about to check it in. Thanks for implementing this, I've changed the code a bit to account for the inktype setting and it works wonderful with the BJC driver. (so far I can only see this from the debug messages but I'm longingly waiting for the photo printhead I've ordered....) Andy. |
|
From: Andy T. <th...@ph...> - 2000-02-03 08:43:48
|
Robert L Krawitz wrote: > This sort of nonsense is confusing everyone. Someone tried to give me > a patch to use "lpc status all" rather than "lpc status" because > that's what his lpc needs. This needs to be part of the configuration > process. I can't quite agree with this. I don't know what's true for other distributions than my SuSE. All I can say is you can choose between the bsd-style printing spooler and the plp spooler. To account for the unfortunate difference in the lpc-syntax there'd have to be shipped two binaries of the print-plugin if lpc-args are determined at configuration time. Of cource the choise to activate this paging stuff as default and having it deactivated optionally was not really ideal in the first place. Nevertheless the binary has to deal with the differences, IMHO. If we really don't want to do it the way I've inroduced with my work-around, we can still consider to supply an environment-variable PRINT_PLUGIN_LPC_OPTIONS - you name it - which is checked for by the print-plugin. Although a sort of "Preferences Dialog" would be much more sexy this solution would do for the time being. Perhaps we should leave the current track in long distance terms: Instead of offering all available printers the lpc command gives us we could have a setup dialog for adding/removing printers. The user can choose an appropriate description for the printer which will show up in the main printing dialog (being much more descriptive than /etc/printcap-names) and associates a file or print-command with it (this way we could also either print to various fixes filenames or invoke the FileChooser depending on what the user prefers). The dialog can still support the user by offering installed printers but the strong dependency from the lpc command would vanish. Of course, this is just musing and open to discussion, which is most certainly needed ;-) Andy. |
|
From: S. M. <sm...@rn...> - 2000-02-03 04:02:30
|
Since I'm new to both this project and open source development, can anyone help with cvs? I don't seem to have ssh1 (is there someplace that I can get it aside from ftp.cs.hut.fi, which appears to be down?), so I tried anonymous just to get the tree downloaded. Following the instructions, I got rejected: steve> cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/gimp-print login (Logging in to ano...@cv...) CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: authorization failed: server cvs.gimp-print.sourceforge.net rejected access Help? Steve -- ----------------------------------------- Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I ------------------------------------------ |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 03:25:59
|
I came across your site today. I haven't had a chance to take a look at much of anything yet, but it looks interesting in light of a project I'm working on. I am currently leading a project to enhance the Print plugin for the Gimp called, naturally enough, gimp-print. We're using SourceForge to host our project. We currently have nine developers signed up, and we're working on a variety of things. The plugin was originally written by Mike Sweet of Easy Software (easysw.com), who brought it up to release 2.0; I did the 3.0 release myself, and our team is working on the 3.1 development branch leading up to a 3.2 stable release. The Gimp 1.2 will probably have the current stable release (3.0.5). Currently this plugin consists of a GUI, a variety of printer drivers (for Postscript, and a variety of Epson, HP, and just recently added Canon inkjets), and a selection of dithering engines. In 3.0, I started work on separating the front end GUI from the drivers and dithering engine, with the intention of eventually making the Print plugin be a thin glue layer between the Gimp and a more general Linux/Unix printing system. Henryk Richter wrote a prototype GhostScript driver for Epson Stylus printers based on this. work. We're continuing along these lines in 3.1. Henryk's prototype identified some problems with 3.0 that we've been fixing along the way. It's quite clear that the drivers, rendering engine, and even the GUI don't belong in the Gimp; they belong in a driver layer, and it's also clear that the user interface cannot be entirely printer-independent, since different printers have different capabilities that must be presented to the user. Anyway, if you'd like to check out what we're up to, please visit our home page at http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net. We don't have a 3.1-based release just yet, because we've been concentrating a lot on infrastructure and haven't yet gotten around to stabilizing things enough to merit a real development release yet. However, we'd certainly like to share ideas and code (we're GPL) with anyone else working on improving the printing situation. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 03:05:10
|
This is an "Application Printing Services API". It's a bit sparse right now, but it's worth a check. |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 01:14:21
|
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:28:40 +0100 From: Andy Thaller <th...@ph...> I'm coming to a point where I'd need the possibility to choose the installed ink cartridges in the GUI: my BJC can be equipped either with a K/CMY combination or Kcm/CMY heads. Other printers allow choosing between K and CMY, etc, so generalizing this would make sense for me. I'm not too familiar with GTK so if someone offers to change the dialog appropriately I'd concentrate on further bjc-support. I went and did it, but I called it "Ink Type" rather than "Print Head". This would be useful for other things, such as Luminos inks for Epson printers. Luminos inks are special archival inks that are available for some printers. They have different characteristics from Epson inks. I'm about to check it in. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 00:42:26
|
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:28:40 +0100 From: Andy Thaller <th...@ph...> the BJC6000 much more sanely. Except for the still missing left image offset the driver should work - as soon as the latter is done we can put up a notice about canon-support in the webpages. BTW: the new dithering stuff works fine with the canon driver :-) Good work! Another change fixes the lpc-related bug haunting my box ever since I'm using the print-plugin: The plp-lpc tool has some paging functionality which prints the message "Press RETURN to continue or 'b' for back one page or 'q' to quit:" after each page leading to some quite funny printer entries and extraordinarily wide dropdown boxes ;-) This sort of nonsense is confusing everyone. Someone tried to give me a patch to use "lpc status all" rather than "lpc status" because that's what his lpc needs. This needs to be part of the configuration process. I'm coming to a point where I'd need the possibility to choose the installed ink cartridges in the GUI: my BJC can be equipped either with a K/CMY combination or Kcm/CMY heads. Other printers allow choosing between K and CMY, etc, so generalizing this would make sense for me. I'm not too familiar with GTK so if someone offers to change the dialog appropriately I'd concentrate on further bjc-support. It wouldn't be too hard, but it would break compatibility with the current printrc format (well, I guess we could simply append it to the end of the current format, but that would be ugly...). We really need to think about this, because it's going to come up with other printers, too... The new parameter could be PrintHead and if '*_parameters()' returns a NULL pointer the dropdown box could be omitted. Any objections, comments or volunteers? I'm not opposed, just pointing out an ugliness. |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-03 00:23:28
|
I took out the fancy 8-byte ESC(c command and replaced it with the conventional 4-byte variant. This might help people with 740's. Could someone give it a try? Also, would people on this list like to receive CVS commit messages? I'm receiving them myself, but it occurred to me that people might like to know what's going on without actually having to take updates. |
|
From: Dave H. <da...@mi...> - 2000-02-02 21:03:22
|
Robert L Krawitz <rl...@al...> wrote > Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:29:37 +0800 > From: Nick Urbanik <ni...@vt...> > CC: gim...@li... > > Robert L Krawitz wrote: > > > But I have > > already run into a problem compiling 3.05. I've only briefly scanned > > the list archives, so perhaps this has already been answered, but I get > > an error in print.c regarding libgimp/gimpintl.h missing. I did a find > > from / and it isn't anywhere. I have 1.04 installed. Is this a new > > file or is something else going on? > > I mentioned this problem with RH Linux 6.1 on Intel PIII. > > > If you put -DGIMP_1_0 on the build command line you supposedly can > > build it under 1.0, but 1.1 is better for this. > > Putting -DGIMP_1_0 did not solve the problem of libgimp/gimpintl.h > missing. P.S. As I mentioned in my previous email, I used an > edited version of Makefile.standalone (patch was in previous > email). > > Trust me, it will, one of these days :-) > > Hoping one day to be able to get printing working properly. > > I haven't played with the 1.0 support myself; it's entirely possible > it's broken, unfortunately... > The 1.0 support is still working in the CVS I downloaded today! Check in print.c at line 64 for the line:- #ifdef GIMP_1_0 The code that follows this ifdef only includes libgimp/gimpintl.h if GIMP_1_0 is NOT defined on the command line when compiling. The line in my Makefile.standalone reads:- OPTLEVEL = -O6 -funroll-all-loops -Wall -DGIMP_1_0 and it compiles fine with GIMP 1.0.4. Dave Hill -- Dave Hill, Kempston, Bedford UK da...@mi... Sicth munce ago, I cutn't evun spel enjuneer, and now I are one! |
|
From: Andy T. <th...@ph...> - 2000-02-02 16:25:47
|
I've just committed some changes to the canon-driver allowing it to initialize the BJC6000 much more sanely. Except for the still missing left image offset the driver should work - as soon as the latter is done we can put up a notice about canon-support in the webpages. BTW: the new dithering stuff works fine with the canon driver :-) Another change fixes the lpc-related bug haunting my box ever since I'm using the print-plugin: The plp-lpc tool has some paging functionality which prints the message "Press RETURN to continue or 'b' for back one page or 'q' to quit:" after each page leading to some quite funny printer entries and extraordinarily wide dropdown boxes ;-) I'm coming to a point where I'd need the possibility to choose the installed ink cartridges in the GUI: my BJC can be equipped either with a K/CMY combination or Kcm/CMY heads. Other printers allow choosing between K and CMY, etc, so generalizing this would make sense for me. I'm not too familiar with GTK so if someone offers to change the dialog appropriately I'd concentrate on further bjc-support. The new parameter could be PrintHead and if '*_parameters()' returns a NULL pointer the dropdown box could be omitted. Any objections, comments or volunteers? Andy. |
|
From: Dave H. <da...@mi...> - 2000-02-02 13:45:57
|
Hi Just a note to say that I have joined the gimp-print-devel list and the gimp-print project on Sourceforge. My name is Dave Hill and I am a Unix Sysadmin in real life. I am currently "resting" after a 4 year contract so I get some time to play with my Linux box. Although an engineer by education, I was a programmer for a number of years, but not in C. Therefore I tend to write code that may not use all the esoteric features of C, but usually works! I use a HP Deskjet 600C printer with the Gimp print plugin, hence my joining the project. I am interested in improving the HP printer support and making sure that it doesn't get too badly broken by other changes!! Are there any other HP printer users on the list? I have found that a great source of HP information is the ghostscript driver "hpdj" by Martin Lottermoser, see ftp://ftp.sbs.de/pub/graphics/ghostscript/pcl3 Regards Dave Hill -- Dave Hill, Kempston, Bedford UK da...@mi... Sicth munce ago, I cutn't evun spel enjuneer, and now I are one! |
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-02 03:10:49
|
I've just made an important change to print-util.c (and minor changes
to print-escp2.c and print-pcl.c). In place of the mishmash of
constants in print-util, I created a struct (dither_t) that contains
all the constants. It looks like this:
typedef struct dither
{
int error[ERROR_ROWS][NCOLORS][MAX_CARRIAGE_WIDTH*MAX_BPI+1];
int cbits;
int lcbits;
int mbits;
int lmbits;
int ybits;
int lybits;
int kbits;
int k_lower;
int k_upper;
int lc_level;
int lm_level;
int ly_level;
int c_randomizer;
int m_randomizer;
int y_randomizer;
int k_randomizer;
int nc_l;
int nc_log;
int *c_transitions;
int *c_levels;
int nlc_l;
int nlc_log;
int *lc_transitions;
int *lc_levels;
int nm_l;
int nm_log;
int *m_transitions;
int *m_levels;
int nlm_l;
int nlm_log;
int *lm_transitions;
int *lm_levels;
int ny_l;
int ny_log;
int *y_transitions;
int *y_levels;
int nly_l;
int nly_log;
int *ly_transitions;
int *ly_levels;
int nk_l;
int nk_log;
int *k_transitions;
int *k_levels;
} dither_t;
Currently, this is essentially static in nature, but there's no reason
that each printer driver couldn't set it up as appropriate. This is
necessary to allow different printers to share the same dithering
routine.
It printed something out correctly on my printer, so I know it works
perfectly :-) Seriously, this change was pervasive enough so that
something's almost surely not right somewhere, so take a look at it if
you suspect anything. Or, if you're close to having something
working, you might not want to take this update quite yet.
--
Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu...
Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
|
|
From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-02 03:06:41
|
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 16:15:40 +0100 From: Andy Thaller <th...@ph...> BTW: Can I set the density and gamma value for each color and media type seperately or is there only one global for all? There's currently only one density and gamma value, but there's no reason they couldn't vary for each color. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |