Re: [Geoserver-users] WMS multipleValues attribute to dimension looks missing...

[Hugo H. C. <hug...@gm...>]

I don't know if multipleValues attribute for dimension tag is natively in
GeoServer or if you need a customization of your capability document.

you mean having a layer with two different time dimension, for example, one
with periocity of month and another with peridicity of days?
would that mean having two time dimension declaration in the capability
document or that possibility implies just one time name dimension
declaration?

If is the second case maybe next paragraph doesn't sound good (:

A layer may provide a dimension declaration that has the same name
attribute (case-insensitive matching) as a
declaration in another layer. However, the dimension shall not be
re-declared using the same name with
conflicting units or unitSymbol attributes. Extent values, and the
attributes default, nearestValue and
multipleValues, may be different for each layer.

Greetings,

El lun, 19 jul 2021 a las 17:50, carlo cancellieri (<
geo...@gm...>) escribió:

> Dear List,
>  I've a question over the getCapabilities 1.3.0 related the WMS dimensions.
> I'm over geoserver 2.18.0
>
> Into the standard definitions page (page 52) Table C.1 — Contents of a
> dimension element
> available here:
>
> https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=14416
>
> I see multipleValues=0|1 available as OPTIONAL attribute to the dimension.
>
> Now I also see that geoserver is using all the other parameters but not
> this one.
>
> We are working on a frontend and we would like to recognize (without
> having to specify over the frontend configuration) if the layer supports
> the multiple dimension values or not, not supposing that but checking the
> real backend capabilities so also checking for that attribute.
>
> MapServer is implementing that so I was wondering IF there's a way to
> obtain the same attribute also from geoserver (already implemented).
>
> I know geoserver supports multiple values but from the url we can't
> understand if it's a geoserver and personally I would not add logic to
> frontend if the indication of that 'may' come from the backend.
>
> What do you think? Should we add that or there are specific thoughts over
> that attribute that I'm not aware of?
>
> Thanks. Regards.
> C.
>
> --
> Mr. Carlo Cancellieri
> *skype*: ccancellieri
> *Twitter*: @cancellieric
> *LinkedIn*: http://it.linkedin.com/in/ccancellieri/
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
>
> Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
> this list:
> - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
> http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
> - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
> http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
>
> If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
>
>
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>


-- 
Hugo Herrador Carrasco
SP (+34) 659 26 84 11
hug...@gm...