From: Andrea A. <and...@ge...> - 2012-05-31 06:34:22
|
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Jody Garnett <jod...@gm...> wrote: > As discussed in Mondays IRC meeting i have written up some > proposed guidelines for creating issues in jira, including the policy on > resolving vs closing issues. > > The first draft is up here: > > > https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/blob/jira_doc/doc/en/user/source/introduction/jira_howto.rst > > Give it a read over and let me know what you think. > > Looks good; I like the part about setting expectations. > > For reference here is the geotools page on the subject: > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/welcome/support.html#issue-tracker > > (The only advantage is the use of an example). > > I think we should make a note (on both pages) about submitting patches with > test cases. And if you are keen the option to submit a pull_request against > the official github fork. Yep, a patch that can be applied right away should be (imho) prioritized over others. At least that's what I normally do during weekends, only look at patches with attachments, then sort them out so that I look first at the full ones, then at the ones without tests, and then at reports where the user at least decided to attach some extra information to reproduce. Not perfect by any means, but better than going randomly into jira imho Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf |