From: Andrea A. <and...@ge...> - 2011-03-22 12:11:52
|
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Aime <and...@ge...> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Gabriel Roldán <gr...@op...> wrote: >> I guess it depends on what you call the same job. Serving static >> contents like in the epsg database case doesn't seem to be _the_ same >> job than updating usage statistics every time a tile (out of potentially >> many millions) is stored or served. >> >> not sure what you expect me to say other than we're all trying to do our >> best with the resources we have, have I won't be sarcastic and invite >> you joining the gwc development team cause I know you're under high load >> too. > > Sigh Gabriel, I did not expect to say anything particular, nor to do anything > right away. > I'm just saying that long term having many embedded databases around is > messy and should be imho solved. I did not say we have to do it today. Btw, I stand corrected on the duplicated work stuff, I did not know Berkeley DB is actually a nosql database, it seems does not even have a JDBC interface. Its kvp structure could actually be amenable to be used as storage for the superoverlay stuff, but could not be used to store the EPSG dababase unless someone writes from scratch a new referencing authority. Cheers Andrea -- ------------------------------------------------------- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ------------------------------------------------------- |