|
From: Jody G. <jod...@gm...> - 2009-03-11 03:32:02
|
We could also fix the GeoTools parsing; if you have a specific capabilities document we could use to write a test case it would be good. Jody On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Per Engström <pe...@gm...> wrote: > Hello list. > I've been working on GeoWebCache (GWC) for some time now and I've just come > across a bit of a problem when caching layers with multiple projections > (SRS:s). The problem occurs when the Capabillities document only specifies a > BoundingBox for one SRS and not one BoundingBox for each SRS. This is ok > according to OGC:s WMS spec 1.1.1: > "A server which has the ability to transform data to different SRSes *may*choose not to > provide an explicit BoundingBox for every possible SRS available for each > Layer. The > server *should* provide BoundingBox information for at least the native > SRS of the Layer." > > As I understand this is the default behaviour of GeoServer. > > However, GeoTools (GWC utilizes GeoTools for parsing the Capabilities > document) is not able to recognize SRS:s that does not have a specified > BoundingBox, thus GWC is unable to recognize and cache the layer in those > projections. > > My question is: > Is there a way to force GeoServer to provide a BoundingBox for all SRS:s > provided? > > Regards, > Per Engström > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > |