From: LaurentPierre <ma...@le...> - 2008-08-28 16:31:52
|
Chris Holmes-4 wrote: > > Darn. If you could include the sld you're using too that could be good. > Though we should be including the namespace. And should also detect > if a style is going to be empty and not use it in that case. > I changed from my style to a standard one in geoserver (poi) and it didn't change anything Chris Holmes-4 wrote: > > > Also, in case you haven't found it, > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOSDOC/1+Reporting+Issues has instructions > on reporting things. > I'll do it this we Chris Holmes-4 wrote: > > We also might consider reporting it on OpenLayers too, it would be good > if they were more flexible on the KML they read, as there's a lot of bad > KML out there that Google handles fine. Things like extra empty xml > elements and lack of namespace I feel like it should be able to handle. > > Thanks for bringing this to our attention. > > I reported to OpenLayers but I had no answers yet. But you're right they should be more flexible : I'll tell them in the next post. Cheers and thank you for your help Laurent -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/KML-from-Geoserver-to-Openlayers-tp19199815p19204286.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |