From: Brent O. <bo...@op...> - 2006-10-04 16:08:29
|
I can confirm that PNG and JPEG are larger in the WCS result than in 1.4. WMS request using States layer. Size in Kb: PNG JPEG trunk 65 32 WCS 128 98 Brent Owens (The Open Planning Project) Alexander Petkov wrote: > It also seems that PNG images saved from a WMS getMap request are > morbidly obese in the current WCS release. > > For example, the getMap.url example from the "Sample Requests" gives > different results: > > 39K(trunk) vs 538K (WCS branch). > > Alex > > On 10/2/06, Brent Owens <bo...@op...> wrote: >> Some initial comments. >> Looks good so far, nice work guys. >> >> 1) Under the Data UI page of the web admin, you have changed 'Data >> Stores' to 'Feature Stores'. Could we keep it the same to reduce >> confusion when we switch over? I understand why you made the >> distinction, but just to save the users some grief. Or if people don't >> like the name "Data Store" (like me), then could we switch it to >> something more clear as to what it is, like 'Data sets', or 'Feature >> Data Sets' and 'Coverage Data Sets'? >> >> 2) The 'Coverage Plugins' link on the Data page should probably be moved >> to Config -> WCS because it just lists what is enabled and doesn't >> really point at data, and is not configurable through the UI, where >> everything else under 'Data' is configurable. >> >> 3) Demo page. It would be sweet to have an example on the demo page. Is >> it possible we could add the coverages to the map preview page? >> >> 4) UI mouse-over hints. This is more of a general comment to a bunch of >> the hints we have for the admin UI that appear when you put the mouse >> over the text. Often we have very poor comments that do not help the >> user determine what the particular text field is supposed to do, if the >> field is optional/mandatory >> >> Brent Owens >> (The Open Planning Project) >> >> >> >> Alessio Fabiani wrote: >> > Hi all guys, >> > the release is ready and alredy committed and uploaded to sourceforge. >> > >> > A lot of bugfixes are done during releasing: javadoc, >> > GEOSERVER_DATA_DIR, Jetty, etc... >> > >> > The release works against Java 1.4.2+, GeoTools 2.3.0-M0 release, JAI >> > 1.1.4 and ImageIO 1.1. >> > >> > ArcGrid module is not working well on this release because of the new >> > one is available on Geotools 2.4.x+. >> > Next release will have ArcGrids and GRIBs back plus a lot of other >> > plugins :) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Alessio. >> > >> > -- >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >> > Eng. Alessio Fabiani >> > Vice President/CTO GeoSolutions >> > >> > http://www.geo-solutions.it <http://www.geo-solutions.it> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >> share your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> Geo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >> > > !DSPAM:1005,4523d9d389461775926497! > |