From: Radim K. - SF.N. <hs...@se...> - 2004-11-01 08:40:58
|
FSP v3 I am also not sure if FSP v3 is really needed. Wireless devices has auth+encryption on layer 2 level and in TCP network we can setup tunnels or IPSEC for this purpose. Also in Wifi networks, IPSEC is very often used. I do not want to design, maintain and then implement over bloated protocol. If you know GSM protocol specs - this is very over bloated protocol and is very hard to implement it right. Wireless providers have major problems with device interoperability. SSL/TLS is another monster; implement this in hardware is nightmare. Implement FSP v2 in 8bit chip is easy task. When I want password protected data, i have sftp. So implementing sftp feature set FSP v3 is waste of time. |