From: Ralf Q. <fre...@gm...> - 2024-08-21 19:13:31
|
Yeah, that's one of the things were AVast (and other AV applications too) has gotten really bad. Anything that even remotely looks like "messing" directly with the hard drive is being flagged as potentially malicious. Same goes for a lot of self-developed software, simply due to the fact that the AV scanners are trying to detect malware not based on actual malware code, but common library code used by standard compilers. This might be less of a problem these days for "modern" Windows or Linux code, specially when written using MS compilers (or gcc in case of Linux), because it is very common. But DOS based code is rather rare these days, less samples for the AV scanners and thus a higher rate of false positives... :( Ralf |