From: Patrick J. L. <pa...@us...> - 2004-01-20 16:46:18
|
Luchezar Georgiev <lu...@ga...> writes: > > (Although the "UMB" does not seem to do anything; the kernel says > > "No UMB's available!" every time. Is this normal?) > > Yes, this is normal, because you REQUEST using UMBs (DOS=..., > DEVICEHIGH=...) but you DON'T have an UMB "provider" like UMBPCI or > EMM386 installed! Shows how ignorant I am about DOS memory management. :-) > Yes, FDXMS can't detect which A20 switching method to use and this > is a disadvantage against HIMEM That is a pretty huge disadvantage... Dare I ask why FreeDOS has both? > The compressed HIMEM64 binary "as is" doesn't work in DR-DOS since > its decompression stub has some incompatibility with their kernel, > but works with all other DOS kernels I tested, including > FreeDOS. But as the symptom is just like it was on DR-DOS, it seems > the problem is the same for you. So enclosed is a binary HIMEM64.EXE > file I compiled myself, UNCOMPRESSED. May it run for you! It works flawlessly. Thank you!! By the way, I should probably mention that I am booting a FreeDOS "virtual floppy" over the network using PXELINUX and memdisk. (Network boot is the only way to install a system, in my opinion.) Perhaps this is related to the decompression problem; I did not even try using a physical floppy. Let me know if you want me to try that, or anything else I can do to help you debug. Thanks again! - Pat |