From: Steffen S. <st...@sc...> - 2011-04-27 06:34:38
|
On 19/04/11 03:58, Chaz Littlejohn wrote: > Steffen, > > I left it as runIt since it may be used for situations where you can > run it more than 2 times. While this is only seen in "THE BIG GAME" > hands (now cancelled), it could pop up again in the future. > > Chaz Sorry for the late reply, been rather busy :/ runItTwice is obviously bad then, how about runMoreThanOnce? Cheers, Steffen > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Steffen Schaumburg > <st...@sc...> wrote: >> The name is rather confusing I think. Given that it's only a bool I >> think it makes sense to rename this field to runItTwice. Since its a >> very new variable the fallout is still rather limited. Comments? If not >> I'll rename it in a week or so. >> >> Cheers, Steffen |