From: Werner L. <wl...@gn...> - 2005-10-31 00:39:00
|
> Someone asked for support for GB 12345-90 encoding, and then went on > to explain that it was just the same as GB2312 except that it used > traditional glyphs. > > In my ignorant way I would think that would mean that as far as I am > concerned the two are the same and the user should be able to use > GB2312 while making his traditional glyphs. No, this won't work. Remember that the Unicode mappings would be wrong altogether. In Unicode's Unihan.txt file just extract the `kGB1' entries for a proper mapping. Werner |