From: George W. <gw...@si...> - 2006-09-28 15:25:08
|
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 10:56, Ralf Stubner wrote: > > The "required" feature is not "non-standard". The only non-standard > > thing is that ff gives it a feature tag which (should) disappear in the > > font. Every LangSys table in the GPOS/GSUB header has a pointer to a > > (nameless) required feature. FF merely names it for convenience. > > Thanks for the information. It seems that it does not disappear from the > font, though: You are right it does retain its tag. However in my tests it is pointed to by the required-feature index and is does not appear in the list features for the script/language combination. In other words the right thing is happening. > The other problem is that this required feature for latn{ISL} is not > applied by XeTeX. Any idea how to debug where the error might be? Did you check what the required feature index looks like for latn{ISL}? |