Re: [Fontforge-users] Ligatures and small caps in Junicode (was: Re: inconsistant kerning)

[George W. <gw...@si...>]

On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 11:29, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to gmane.comp.tex.xetex as well.
> 
> Pablo Rodríguez <oinos-S0/GAf...@pu...> writes:
> 
> > It has been solved by adding the small cap ligatures. But I wonder
> > whether this is the right method for doing it, since if scmp where
> > applied first, there would be no characters to apply the f i liga GSUB.
> 
> Yes, a correct ordering of the features would be better. Normally
> fontforge does the right thing here. However, it seems the the incorrect
> 'liag' feature confuses fontforge. Renaming that to liga (even though it
> really isn't a ligature) gave a correct TTF. This is discussion is more
> suitable for a fontforge list, though, which is why I am moving it
> there. 
I don't have enough context to understand what is going on.
You may adjust the order of features with
Element->FontInfo->OS/2->Set GSUB/morx Ordering

If you use non-standard feature names ff won't know how they should be
ordered.