|
From: George W. <gw...@si...> - 2008-12-05 23:36:47
|
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 23:28, JustFillBug wrote: > On 2008-12-03, George Williams <gw...@si...> wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 18:47, JustFillBug wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I want to know does the replaceWithReference() try to scale to the > >> targetting contour's bounding box? From my test, it seems not. > > It does not, nor is it intended to. > > > > If you want to do this use the Find / Replace dialog. > > > > Find/Replace does not work for what I want. > > I want to replace part of a glyph with another glyph without changing > its shape. This is basically what the replaceWithReference does. Find/Replace will do that too. replaceWithReference just calls Find/Replace which has a much wider set of choices available. > The difference is that the part of the glyph might be a scaled up > version of the reference contour. Therefore the reference will have a > scale up transformation matrix. Yup. > > And I want to do this in python. Ah. > Could you add a flag option to the find() to let user specify finding Nope. I am swamped. But you may. |