Menu
▾
▴
fofredux-devel — Developers discussion, bug fixing, and coding of fofredux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(142) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(76) |
Apr
(172) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(78) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
|
From: Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...> - 2006-05-19 19:18:53
|
So what is the current status of the Framework modifications? Is it ready to get View stuff added to it? I'm going to be picking up and putting together a bunch of View stuff this weekend and wanted to get an idea of what's going on w/ the framework. Thanks a bunch, Andrew --=20 Andrew Turner ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-19 19:18:46
|
On 5/19/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > I'm running today's snapshot and don't see the probem Miles describes. > There have been quite a few model/db changes recently, most likely his bu= g > was fixed as a side effect. > > -Kevin Ah, I'll download the snapshot and see what happens. -Miles |
|
From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2006-05-19 19:10:11
|
> ok, that was my added feature...so probably my bug too. i'll take a lo= ok > at > it this week...i'm assuming you can still use the app normally otherwis= e? I'm running today's snapshot and don't see the probem Miles describes.=20 There have been quite a few model/db changes recently, most likely his bu= g was fixed as a side effect. -Kevin > On 5/19/06, Miles Beck <mil...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hm, in looking at this some more I found the real reason this was >> occuring. >> >> It has to do with the "list only feeds with unread items" option. >> >> What I had done before was delete a feed, then I wondered if it was >> really gone so I went into the options section and then de-selected >> the checkbox for "list only feeds with unread items" and then saved. >> >> Once you deselect that option and then try and click on a feed with >> new items in it the error is generated. Various errors also happen >> when clicking on "view new items", "view all items, paged", "view >> today's items" and "view saved items". >> >> This is easily reproducible at least on my machine with the steps >> outlined above. >> >> -Miles >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >> security? >> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >> easier >> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >> Geronimo >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=120709&bid&3057&dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Fofredux-devel mailing list >> Fof...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel >> > --=20 Kevin |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-19 18:31:48
|
On 5/19/06, Evan Roth <eva...@gm...> wrote: > ok, that was my added feature...so probably my bug too. i'll take a look= at > it this week...i'm assuming you can still use the app normally otherwise? > > /evan Yes. In testing this I was restoring from a backup of the database. Which I did several times to narrow down the problem. So for right now I still have the option enabled and things are fine. When you think you have it fixed I can grab the new snapshot and then verify here that it works for me as well. -Miles |
|
From: Evan R. <eva...@gm...> - 2006-05-19 18:27:18
|
ok, that was my added feature...so probably my bug too. i'll take a look a= t it this week...i'm assuming you can still use the app normally otherwise? /evan On 5/19/06, Miles Beck <mil...@gm...> wrote: > > Hm, in looking at this some more I found the real reason this was > occuring. > > It has to do with the "list only feeds with unread items" option. > > What I had done before was delete a feed, then I wondered if it was > really gone so I went into the options section and then de-selected > the checkbox for "list only feeds with unread items" and then saved. > > Once you deselect that option and then try and click on a feed with > new items in it the error is generated. Various errors also happen > when clicking on "view new items", "view all items, paged", "view > today's items" and "view saved items". > > This is easily reproducible at least on my machine with the steps > outlined above. > > -Miles > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronim= o > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=120709&bid&3057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-19 17:57:05
|
Hm, in looking at this some more I found the real reason this was occuring. It has to do with the "list only feeds with unread items" option. What I had done before was delete a feed, then I wondered if it was really gone so I went into the options section and then de-selected the checkbox for "list only feeds with unread items" and then saved. Once you deselect that option and then try and click on a feed with new items in it the error is generated. Various errors also happen when clicking on "view new items", "view all items, paged", "view today's items" and "view saved items". This is easily reproducible at least on my machine with the steps outlined above. -Miles |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-19 16:05:39
|
On 5/19/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > Miles, > Does this only happen when viewing items by feed? what about by > category, all unread, all today, etc? I did not try anything other than clicking on a feed with unread items. I have restored my database from a backup and the problem no longer occurs. > What database type/version is this, and was it changed recently? Someon= e > else had a problem where the db was upgraded and it munged the data a bit= . This is a mysql database version 4. I'll make a copy of the database and see if I can get this to happen again. -Miles |
|
From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2006-05-19 16:00:17
|
Miles wrote: > On 5/18/06, Evan Roth <eva...@gm...> wrote: >> ah...i get it...you probably deleted feed number 2? could that be? >> (it'd >> have been the 2nd feed you added since starting from a clean db) >> >> i'll try this this weekend then...should be reproducable somehow If feed 2 no longer existed, then the query would return no rows. It shouldn't generate a syntax error. Actually if feed 2 didn't exist, it shouldn't show up in the feed list at all. Miles, Does this only happen when viewing items by feed? what about by category, all unread, all today, etc? > Should I restore the database from a backup? > > Or is there a way to fix this install? What database type/version is this, and was it changed recently? Someon= e else had a problem where the db was upgraded and it munged the data a bit= . --=20 Kevin |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-19 06:49:10
|
On 5/18/06, Evan Roth <eva...@gm...> wrote: > ah...i get it...you probably deleted feed number 2? could that be? (it'= d > have been the 2nd feed you added since starting from a clean db) > > i'll try this this weekend then...should be reproducable somehow Should I restore the database from a backup? Or is there a way to fix this install? -Miles |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 21:33:05
|
On 5/18/06, Evan Roth <eva...@gm...> wrote: > what version of mysql are you on? > obviously the error is getting thrown, since the recordset is not > created...thus no object. in other words, we could beef up error handlin= g > here as well. > > /evan I'm using php4 on a Debian install. What I don't understand is why this happened after deleting a feed. -Miles |
|
From: Evan R. <eva...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 21:23:44
|
that SQL is good on my side when i run it in phpmyadmin. returning no results (nothing unread) but not dying on me at least. what version of mysql are you on? obviously the error is getting thrown, since the recordset is not created...thus no object. in other words, we could beef up error handling here as well. /evan On 5/18/06, Miles Beck <mil...@gm...> wrote: > > On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > > Okay, so this is the queries that happen on the panel/index page. Try > > hitting a link for unread items on a feed. What are the queries/errors > > when view.php is run. > > This was all before the links box. > > (mysql): SELECT name, value FROM fr_config > Error (0): > > (mysql): select url, title, link, id, category_id, latitude, > longitude, auto_tag, update_enabled, last_update from fr_feeds where > id =3D '2' > Error (0): > > Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by > (output started at > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/adodb_lite/adodb.inc.php:307) in > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 83 > > Between the search dialog and the Old to New link was the following error= : > (mysql): SELECT i.flag as item_read, f.title as feed_title, f.link as > feed_link, i.id as item_id, i.link as item_link, i.title as > item_title, i.cache_time, i.content as item_content, i.publish_time, > i.dccreator as dccreator, i.dcsubject as dcsubject, i.latitude as > latitude, i.longitude as longitude, cat.id as category_id, cat.title > as category_title, i.enclosure_link as enclosure_link, > i.enclosure_type as enclosure_type, f.url as feed_url FROM fr_feeds f > JOIN fr_categories cat ON (f.category_id =3D cat.id) JOIN fr_items i ON > (i.feed_id =3D f.id) WHERE 1 =3D 1 AND f.id =3D '2' AND (i.flag is NULL O= R > i.flag =3D 0) order by i.publish_time desc, i.id desc LIMIT 0, > Error (1064): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual > that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to > use near '' at line 1 > > And lastly the following error: > Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/view.php on line 83 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronim= o > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=120709&bid&3057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 21:09:41
|
On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > Okay, so this is the queries that happen on the panel/index page. Try > hitting a link for unread items on a feed. What are the queries/errors > when view.php is run. This was all before the links box. (mysql): SELECT name, value FROM fr_config Error (0): (mysql): select url, title, link, id, category_id, latitude, longitude, auto_tag, update_enabled, last_update from fr_feeds where id =3D '2' Error (0): Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/adodb_lite/adodb.inc.php:307) in /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 83 Between the search dialog and the Old to New link was the following error: (mysql): SELECT i.flag as item_read, f.title as feed_title, f.link as feed_link, i.id as item_id, i.link as item_link, i.title as item_title, i.cache_time, i.content as item_content, i.publish_time, i.dccreator as dccreator, i.dcsubject as dcsubject, i.latitude as latitude, i.longitude as longitude, cat.id as category_id, cat.title as category_title, i.enclosure_link as enclosure_link, i.enclosure_type as enclosure_type, f.url as feed_url FROM fr_feeds f JOIN fr_categories cat ON (f.category_id =3D cat.id) JOIN fr_items i ON (i.feed_id =3D f.id) WHERE 1 =3D 1 AND f.id =3D '2' AND (i.flag is NULL OR i.flag =3D 0) order by i.publish_time desc, i.id desc LIMIT 0, Error (1064): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1 And lastly the following error: Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/view.php on line 83 |
|
From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2006-05-18 20:34:53
|
> On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: >> * disable debug in config.php >> * login and go to the page that throws the error in view.php line 83 >> * enable debug in config.php >> * refresh the page and see what it prints out. I'm interested in >> non-zero >> error codes after it prints out an sql query. >> >> "Error (NNN): something blew up..." > > The following error was displayed before the link box. > (mysql): SELECT name, value FROM fr_config > Error (0): > > Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by > (output started at > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/adodb_lite/adodb.inc.php:307) in > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 83 > > then after the search field but before the feeds listing the following > error was displayed: > > (mysql): select feed.id, feed.url, feed.title, feed.link, > feed.category_id, cat.title as category_title, feed.latitude, > feed.longitude, feed.update_enabled, feed.last_update from fr_feeds > feed, fr_categories cat WHERE cat.id =3D feed.category_id > Error (0): > > (mysql): SELECT COUNT( i.feed_id ) as count, i.feed_id as id FROM > fr_feeds f, fr_items i WHERE f.id =3D i.feed_id AND (flag is null OR > flag =3D 0) GROUP BY i.feed_id > Error (0): > > (mysql): select count( feed_id ) as count, feed_id as id from fr_feeds > f, fr_items i where f.id =3D i.feed_id group by i.feed_id > Error (0): Okay, so this is the queries that happen on the panel/index page. Try hitting a link for unread items on a feed. What are the queries/errors when view.php is run. --=20 Kevin |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 19:11:25
|
On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > * disable debug in config.php > * login and go to the page that throws the error in view.php line 83 > * enable debug in config.php > * refresh the page and see what it prints out. I'm interested in non-zer= o > error codes after it prints out an sql query. > > "Error (NNN): something blew up..." The following error was displayed before the link box. (mysql): SELECT name, value FROM fr_config Error (0): Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/adodb_lite/adodb.inc.php:307) in /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 83 then after the search field but before the feeds listing the following error was displayed: (mysql): select feed.id, feed.url, feed.title, feed.link, feed.category_id, cat.title as category_title, feed.latitude, feed.longitude, feed.update_enabled, feed.last_update from fr_feeds feed, fr_categories cat WHERE cat.id =3D feed.category_id Error (0): (mysql): SELECT COUNT( i.feed_id ) as count, i.feed_id as id FROM fr_feeds f, fr_items i WHERE f.id =3D i.feed_id AND (flag is null OR flag =3D 0) GROUP BY i.feed_id Error (0): (mysql): select count( feed_id ) as count, feed_id as id from fr_feeds f, fr_items i where f.id =3D i.feed_id group by i.feed_id Error (0): |
|
From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2006-05-18 19:05:07
|
> On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
>>
>> > On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Which revision is it? I made changes to view.php recently and the
>> line
>> >> numbers don't match up.
>>
>> Try changing/adding this line in config.php. It is most likely throwi=
ng
>> a
>> database error and we're thinking it succeeded.
>>
>> define('FOF_DB_DEBUG', true);
>
> Now when I try to login I get the below error:
>
> (mysql): SELECT name, value FROM fr_config
> Error (0):
>
> Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by
> (output started at
> /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/adodb_lite/adodb.inc.php:307) in
> /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 21
Hmm. this will require some timing.
* disable debug in config.php
* login and go to the page that throws the error in view.php line 83
* enable debug in config.php
* refresh the page and see what it prints out. I'm interested in non-zer=
o
error codes after it prints out an sql query.
"Error (NNN): something blew up..."
--
Kevin
|
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 18:58:26
|
On 5/18/06, Miles Beck <mil...@gm...> wrote: > > Now when I try to login I get the below error: > > (mysql): SELECT name, value FROM fr_config > Error (0): > > Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by > (output started at > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/adodb_lite/adodb.inc.php:307) in > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 21 > I also turned on the php debugging to see if that resulted in any more information. In addition to the above error I saw this with php debugging on. Not sure if it's related but thought more might be helpful. Notice: Undefined index: username in /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 21 |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 18:52:47
|
On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
>
> > On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Which revision is it? I made changes to view.php recently and the lin=
e
> >> numbers don't match up.
>
> Try changing/adding this line in config.php. It is most likely throwing =
a
> database error and we're thinking it succeeded.
>
> define('FOF_DB_DEBUG', true);
Now when I try to login I get the below error:
(mysql): SELECT name, value FROM fr_config
Error (0):
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by
(output started at
/var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/adodb_lite/adodb.inc.php:307) in
/var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/header.php on line 21
|
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 18:47:48
|
On 5/18/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > > Which revision is it? I made changes to view.php recently and the line > numbers don't match up. $Id: view.php 396 2006-04-30 19:51:00Z eroth $ |
|
From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2006-05-18 18:46:03
|
> I just got the following error after deleting a feed. Now when I click > on a feed with unread items I get the above error. > > Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in > /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/view.php on line 83 > > Any idea of how to correct this? Which revision is it? I made changes to view.php recently and the line numbers don't match up. --=20 Kevin |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-18 18:15:14
|
I just got the following error after deleting a feed. Now when I click on a feed with unread items I get the above error. Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /var/www/fofredux_0.4-dev/view.php on line 83 Any idea of how to correct this? -Miles |
|
From: Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...> - 2006-05-17 21:57:53
|
On 5/17/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > > > We had discussed moving read/unread/saved to tags, which provides you > > with the mixed case scenario you gave. It also takes out a lot of > > "special handling" in the logic. Perhaps just keep the "read" flag but > > move the saved to a tag. > > Yea, we figured the item flag really is just a special kind of tag. By > using the tag <-> item relationship in the database we can add new flags > or alter their behavior without changing the db schema. > > We could add a field to the tag table to mark tags for internal use. > They would be filtered from view so the user could not directly > add/remove a reserved tag from an item. That will be handled internally > by the item model code. > I like this idea. It keeps searches and such simpler - less fields and compexity. > -- > Kevin > > --=20 Andrew Turner ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA |
|
From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2006-05-17 21:37:38
|
> We had discussed moving read/unread/saved to tags, which provides you > with the mixed case scenario you gave. It also takes out a lot of > "special handling" in the logic. Perhaps just keep the "read" flag but > move the saved to a tag. Yea, we figured the item flag really is just a special kind of tag. By using the tag <-> item relationship in the database we can add new flags or alter their behavior without changing the db schema. We could add a field to the tag table to mark tags for internal use.=20 They would be filtered from view so the user could not directly add/remove a reserved tag from an item. That will be handled internally by the item model code. --=20 Kevin |
|
From: Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...> - 2006-05-17 21:13:11
|
We had discussed moving read/unread/saved to tags, which provides you with the mixed case scenario you gave. It also takes out a lot of "special handling" in the logic. Perhaps just keep the "read" flag but move the saved to a tag. As for the #saved items or saved feed, this will really just be a sub-set of a saved search, where the search is for all items with the tag "save". So when the functionality for saving searches/views is in the model/controller code, we can add that. I'll be picking up and putting together the UI this weekend. Andrew On 5/17/06, Evan Roth <eva...@gm...> wrote: > miles, > it should be pretty simple to add that, since it's really just a counter, > which we have several of already. > > i've got the next week off, after a grueling 2 weeks in the office, so i'= ll > start attacking some of those features. i've seen that kevin has been > making major headway on the refactoring of everything. > > i think my first goal, since i've got a week set aside...barring anything > strange happening...will be to start to really implement multi-user. i'v= e > got it mentally laid out, but there is tons of database work which means > dissecting some tables and moving the data around a bit. all of that is > easy to start from, but it's trickier to try to mold an existing database > with real data in there. > which gets me to my point. in there is the status flag, which will need = to > be saved for each user to each item. currently, we have 1 flag, with 3 > possible values (unread, read, or saved) > -- does it make sense to build on this? > 1st thought is to split those into 2 flags, read and saved, which means t= hat > an item would be read or unread AND saved or not saved. Does anyone see = any > use for this? my thought would be that, especially for people with tons = of > feeds, they could flip through and save the items they want to read later= , > and then work those off form an alternaview of unread saved items. and > thus, there's a built in filter of special saved items as well as the > massive amount of standard items. (and saved items will never be wiped f= rom > the database, whether read or unread) make sense...or would noone really > use such a capability? > > any other ideas on flags? or views that might be easier...without some s= ort > of text filter at this stage? > > /evan > > > > On 5/17/06, Miles Beck <mil...@gm...> wrote: > > Speaking of features, would it be a lot of work/time to implement a > > feature I added on the feature request page? > > > > The feature number is: 1445226 > > > > Saved items feed > > What I'm really after here is something like a feed display that could > > show you on the main page how many items were in the View Saved Items > > section. This way you could easily see at a glance how many you had > > marked as saved. > > > > It would be great if this could be implemented for 0.4. Hopefully we > > can also see some of the UI redesign make it into SVN soon. > > > > I'd also like to thank everyone for all the great work, this is coming > > along nicely. > > > > -Miles > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit= y? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geron= imo > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=120709&bid&3057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Fofredux-devel mailing list > > Fof...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > > > > --=20 Andrew Turner ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA |
|
From: Evan R. <eva...@gm...> - 2006-05-17 20:43:53
|
miles, it should be pretty simple to add that, since it's really just a counter, which we have several of already. i've got the next week off, after a grueling 2 weeks in the office, so i'll start attacking some of those features. i've seen that kevin has been making major headway on the refactoring of everything. i think my first goal, since i've got a week set aside...barring anything strange happening...will be to start to really implement multi-user. i've got it mentally laid out, but there is tons of database work which means dissecting some tables and moving the data around a bit. all of that is easy to start from, but it's trickier to try to mold an existing database with real data in there. which gets me to my point. in there is the status flag, which will need to be saved for each user to each item. currently, we have 1 flag, with 3 possible values (unread, read, or saved) -- does it make sense to build on this? 1st thought is to split those into 2 flags, read and saved, which means tha= t an item would be read or unread AND saved or not saved. Does anyone see an= y use for this? my thought would be that, especially for people with tons of feeds, they could flip through and save the items they want to read later, and then work those off form an alternaview of unread saved items. and thus, there's a built in filter of special saved items as well as the massive amount of standard items. (and saved items will never be wiped fro= m the database, whether read or unread) make sense...or would noone really use such a capability? any other ideas on flags? or views that might be easier...without some sor= t of text filter at this stage? /evan On 5/17/06, Miles Beck <mil...@gm...> wrote: > > Speaking of features, would it be a lot of work/time to implement a > feature I added on the feature request page? > > The feature number is: 1445226 > > Saved items feed > What I'm really after here is something like a feed display that could > show you on the main page how many items were in the View Saved Items > section. This way you could easily see at a glance how many you had > marked as saved. > > It would be great if this could be implemented for 0.4. Hopefully we > can also see some of the UI redesign make it into SVN soon. > > I'd also like to thank everyone for all the great work, this is coming > along nicely. > > -Miles > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronim= o > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=120709&bid&3057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > |
|
From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-05-17 19:45:38
|
Speaking of features, would it be a lot of work/time to implement a feature I added on the feature request page? The feature number is: 1445226 Saved items feed What I'm really after here is something like a feed display that could show you on the main page how many items were in the View Saved Items section. This way you could easily see at a glance how many you had marked as saved. It would be great if this could be implemented for 0.4. Hopefully we can also see some of the UI redesign make it into SVN soon. I'd also like to thank everyone for all the great work, this is coming along nicely. -Miles |
5 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
