|
From: <Wol...@t-...> - 2001-06-19 20:39:21
|
Curt wrote: >Erik Hofman writes: > >> NO! This is unacceptable for me. This is all very sad :-((. It is bad for fgfs to loose people. >> FlightGear won't even compile on Irix! AFAIK it won't compile on Windo$ without CygWin either. >>=20 >> Thanks Curtis! :-( > >All I can say is that I have to draw the line some place or we will >never, ever be able to produce a decent, stable, low bug release. I Hm. We have the Irix fixes, we have many MSVC fixes and could get the=20 rest (for the workspace generating script) very shortly or, if every day counts take one from Geoff or Christian or hand edit the automatically generated one and I would guess the airport-altitude bug that crashes JSBSim should now be fairly quickly to find as well, after Tony found out the altitude is the problem and David found the current_elev_ssg function. So, IMHO we could solve several major bugs in a very short while (like up to the weekend), not counting the panel aspect patch, or features=20 like the X15. Off course we would then have to test and the 22nd would not be doable. Oh well :-(. >Once we get 0.7.7 out the door at the end of this week we will start >a-fresh on 0.7.8. What is a very rough time estimate on 0.7.8? >Regards, >Curt. Bye bye, Wolfram. |