Re: [Flightgear-devel] multi-threading

[Alex P. <ale...@ie...>]

> I'll also repeat the comment I made when this topic came up earlier -
> that on Windows, a more efficient solution is often to keep everything
> in the same process in the first place and use multithreading. Depending
> on the details of your situation, this may or may not be practical.

That's probably usually true.  The reason for splitting FGFS into processes
is not for performance (because threads do better) but for flexibility.
I anticipate using mutexes and the like to simulate shared memory within
a single machine and then use software replication between chassis.