|
From: Ludovic B. <lu...@lu...> - 2025-12-01 17:50:44
|
James Turner <ja...@fl...> writes: [...] > So, in terms of reducing the number of forks, I’d *prefer* > GitHub/GitLab/etc but you can do what you want since in the end … > people can always fork it. We’re just very close to: > > https://xkcd.com/927/ > > … at that point :) It is possible to reduce the number of forks to zero by working directly in FGAddon (where the various 737s are, already). With git-svn, people used to git can get the best of both worlds: fgaddon serves as the central repository and they can use git locally fi they want to. > In this case, the FGAddon SVN repo becomes gradually less important > (tending towards zero) as maintained aircraft gradually get their own > repos. (We’d be left with the just the attic + unmaintained acft ) Wait, is that a strategy now? Has that been discussed or agreed? Or are you trying to re-ignite the flamewar of 10 years ago that the infamous "FGUSER" group started? -- Ludovic Brenta. |