|
From: Nia <fl...@sy...> - 2025-12-01 16:01:42
|
On 12/1/25 16:33, James Turner wrote: > However, in terms of collaborating on > development, ease of ‘everything’ is helpful (and typically GitHub / > GitLab score highly here, with other providers on a decreasing scale). Well... Github is taking a big step back now... too much stuff I don't need that gets in the way, stuff they want to force on me like the AI stuff... things I can't disable to get them out of the way. And Gitlab is at times really bad to use on a slow train connection... like some times I need just 10 minutes MITM attacker captcha solving, just to log in! Forgejo (the software that runs on codeberg) is like Github 5-10 years ago before the enshittification started. Nice and usable... and light weight. > So, in terms of reducing the number of forks, I’d *prefer* GitHub/ > GitLab/etc but you can do what you want since in the end … people can > always fork it. We’re just very close to: > https://xkcd.com/927/ <https://xkcd.com/927/> But pleeeease? Just ONE MORE fork would fix this! /s ... putting it anywhere but a central repo would just add another standard... cause it's just a matter of time till the story will repeat it self... |