From: <Wol...@t-...> - 2001-06-03 14:05:29
|
I know this question comes up every half year, but every half year the answer has changed :-). What is the "optimal" fgfs desktop PC (with the best price/performance relationship)? I promised to bring a good PC to Stuttgart for the fair, so I either want to upgrade my current one or buy a new=20 additional one. It seems to me Athlon TBird is at least as good as Intel processors? I am looking at the range 1 GHz - 1.4 GHz. I will probably take DDR Ram, either 256 or 512 kB. =46or the graphics processor, I am really unsure about=20 GeForce 2 versus GeForce 3. On the web site comparing=20 the two with the many flight simulators, fgfs is=20 missing :-/. For some simulators, the 3 is much faster than the two and for some the 2 is much faster than the=20 three. The three has many nice features (Pixel/vertex=20 shaders etc), but I doubt that we PLIB/FGFS/PPE=20 programmers will get to the level of using that in the=20 forseeable future. I am not quite sure whether there=20 is a big difference between anisotropic filtering=20 between GeForce 2 and 3.=20 Is there anyone here that has used fgfs with a=20 GeForce 3? Because of the unified drivers, there=20 should be no problems with the GeForce 3 + Linux,=20 should there? I looked throught the old discussion and saw there are some SCSI fans. I used SCSI for a long time (Amiga only had SCSI IIRC), but then switched to IDE. People said that it helps with multiple read operations at the same time. If I only run fgfs, would SCSI help? Would it help compared to two IDE drives? How much difference (in $) is it now? Also, some people suggested dual CPUs. I am not sure it is worth the hassle. How much difference would that be to a single CPU machine? =46or Linux, I want to use SuSE. Bye bye, Wolfram. |