|
From: James T. <ja...@fl...> - 2023-07-19 10:24:48
|
> On 18 Jul 2023, at 22:24, Florent Rougon <f.r...@fr...> wrote: > > Because I spent some time clearing this up due to the somewhat strange > lat/lon data in LIPX.threshold.xml, here is a comment regarding these > *.threshold.xml files (example from TerraSync's LFPG, possibly > outdated): > > <threshold> > <lon>2.61060285</lon> > <lat>48.99875734</lat> > <rwy>26R</rwy> > <hdg-deg>265.41</hdg-deg> > <displ-m>577.0</displ-m> > <stopw-m>0.0</stopw-m> > </threshold> > > AFAICT, and despite the <threshold> element name, the 'lat' and 'lon' > coords should indicate where the runway _end_ resides (i.e. where you > _start_ when taking off from 26R... it's called this way in the apt.dat > v1000 spec) — not the runway threshold. 'displ-m' is the distance from > that runway end to the corresponding threshold. So, changing displ-m has > no effect whatsoever on the startup position when using --runway=26R. That’s because, the displaced threshold is for landing, not taking-off (and hence, starting position) > > One thing I find strange, though, is that I can't use the built-in > launcher as in the attached screenshot in order to start above the > runway threshold: this puts me above the runway end. Maybe I use this > incorrectly? We could add a startup option which is ‘at the threshold’ but again my understanding, received from other more-aviation-trained people than myself, is that displaced thresholds are about landings; for takeoffs you can always use the full paved area as we describe it. (Maybe there is some concept of a ‘displaced start position’ but we don’t encode it anywhere right now) Kind regards, James |