Re: [Flightgear-devel] Segmentation fault acquiring SGPropertyLock

[TheFGFSEagle <the...@gm...>]

Nope, I have CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo.

Am Di., 18. Juli 2023 um 12:51 Uhr schrieb Julian Smith <ju...@op...>:

> On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:29:31 +0200
> TheFGFSEagle <the...@gm...> wrote:
>
> > Ah, so is there a switch to enable them ?
>
> Not sure. We'd need a way to tell cmake not to define NDEBUG.
>
> [I use my own build system for Flightgear, so can control things like
> this more easily.]
>
> - Jules
>
>
> >
> > Am Di., 18. Juli 2023 um 12:16 Uhr schrieb Julian Smith <ju...@op...
> >:
> >
> > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:37:12 +0200
> > > Florent Rougon <f.r...@fr...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Florent Rougon <f.r...@fr...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > the subject matter — and nothing about the freeze process per se.
> Your
> > > > > analysis looks good to me and your patch fixes the crash I reported
> > > > > yesterday.
> > > >
> > > > Seems to be the same crash that Frédéric reported at the beginning of
> > > > this thread, however it appears he built SimGear without the
> assert()s,
> > > > which doesn't help with debugging! ;)
> > >
> > > FWIW i'd prefer to have asserts, or something equivalent to asserts,
> > > active in all builds. As long as we are careful not to assert complex
> > > expressions, the runtime overhead would be negligible, and we'd get to
> > > hear about (and fix) bugs much sooner.
> > >
> > > [Certainly all my builds have asserts enabled.]
> > >
> > > - Jules
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://op59.net
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Flightgear-devel mailing list
> > > Fli...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> http://op59.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Fli...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>