|
From: Julian S. <ju...@op...> - 2023-07-07 21:10:21
|
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:54:20 +0200 James Turner <ja...@fl...> wrote: > > On 3 Jul 2023, at 00:44, Julian Smith <ju...@op...> wrote: > > > > I think my preferred solution here would involve two things: > > I’m not really happy adding *another* option here unless we really > need it. Yes i understand. But against that is the fundamental unreality of the new algorithm - it attempts to define behaviour for when the gear is compressed beyond its real-life breaking point. Hence my preference that if we are to include the algorithm, there should be a way to turn it off. > > Can we add a clamping but at a much higher value than 1.0, eg 8 or 16 > or 100? > > We can also revert for now, while we discuss this? That might be the best thing to do for now - it's not good to have code that can cause FG to hang in normal operation. Thanks, - Jules -- http://op59.net |