|
From: James T. <ja...@fl...> - 2020-08-14 11:42:32
|
> On 14 Aug 2020, at 12:30, Fernando García Liñán <fer...@gm...> wrote: > > My proposal is to build some kind of pipeline "addon": an independent > XML file with the necessary buffers/passes which can be included into > any pipeline. The main issue is that FG's XML parser doesn't allow > multiple include="", so I'm not sure what would be the most elegant > way to do this. You can usually fake by including at different levels, and allowing multiple includes is not actually impossible, I think. Kind regards, James |