|
From: Erik H. <er...@eh...> - 2017-05-23 16:48:04
|
On 05/23/2017 06:44 PM, James Turner wrote: > >> On 23 May 2017, at 17:41, Erik Hofman <er...@eh... >> <mailto:er...@eh...>> wrote: >> >> I've already convinced Jon to accept propertyObjects and they are >> sparsely used these days. So that's a win. >> Next step would be to convert all JSBSim properties. > > I think it’s a boring-but-straightforward task, but before considering > it, is there any possible technical downside? As far as I know tied > properties are strictly less functional than regular ones, but is it > likely anyone is depending on the non-working-ness of listening to > JSBsim props? I really hope not, but the set of weird things done by > some aircraft always surprises me :) To be fair, I consider that a bug at the aircraft developer side of things. Erik -- http://www.adalin.com - High performance virtual reality audio software. |