Re: [Flightgear-devel] Time to divorce X-plane??

[Pedro M. <pe...@fr...>]

I'm not saying we actually need to divorce from x-plane..

Maybe a more efficient way to "verify" data before its send upstream..
ie data is wrong > correct data > verify data > send to xplane



On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Pedro Morgan <pe...@fr...>wrote:

> am kinda working towards that
> http://navdata.fgx.ch
>
> Idea is to push "submissions" (once its working) into a git backend,, and
> get it "voted and confirmed"..
> eg by pilots with an interest in an area = international
>
>
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Alasdair Campbell <al...@bt...>wrote:
>
>> Enjoyed a lovely sunny flight to Inverness (EGPE).
>> Sadly, no ATIS on 109.20
>> I think that FG is now mature enough to hive off and clone
>> it's own "fgapt.dat" where local enthusiasts can  rapidly make
>> changes without being being dependent on Robin's notoriously
>> long update cycle. I am not up to date with the copyright issues, but
>> I think  "This Could Be A Very Good Thing"
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Alasdair
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find
>> out:
>> &#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
>> &#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
>> &#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flightgear-devel mailing list
>> Fli...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>>
>
>