From: Adrian M. <kan...@gm...> - 2013-09-19 16:03:35
|
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 18:45:09 James Turner wrote: > (BTW Adrian proposed something which achieves a similar end result back in > February, the problem with his approach is it doesn't work via the OSG > paging mechanism, and hence I don't think we should pursue it - ultimately > we need to be letting the OSG Pager handle all our loading and unloading, > instead of trying to fit our own LOD systems above / below it) > > Regards, > James I had a private exchange about that in December with Mathias, his method is way better, hence I didn't pursue this any further. I'm still using my code here for the memory benefits but that's related to my radio code. PagedLOD is the way to go, case closed :) Cheers, Adrian |