Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re : Arresting Type Devices

[Martin S. <Mar...@mg...>]

"Vivian Meazza" wrote:

> The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational
> capability along the way.

You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one operational
arrestor would have been the clever solution.

We're trying to simulate real-world, don't we ?  Sure, we're not
perfect but I think we're doing our best within the limits of our
ressources.  Thus, intentionally leaving an inoperational arrestor in
place (instead of fixing it) sounds a bit odd ....

Now, who would like to merge the best of both into one single model -
before the feature freeze ?

Cheers,
	Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------