|
From: Martin S. <Mar...@mg...> - 2011-12-15 22:14:06
|
"Vivian Meazza" wrote: > The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational > capability along the way. You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one operational arrestor would have been the clever solution. We're trying to simulate real-world, don't we ? Sure, we're not perfect but I think we're doing our best within the limits of our ressources. Thus, intentionally leaving an inoperational arrestor in place (instead of fixing it) sounds a bit odd .... Now, who would like to merge the best of both into one single model - before the feature freeze ? Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |