|
From: Erik H. <er...@eh...> - 2011-07-11 11:52:54
|
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 14:45 +0300, tho...@jy... wrote: > I've first suspected that something is fishy with the DG-101G, but since > I've flown all sorts of aircraft through the thermals (as a side note, > it's really interesting that the F-16 instrumentation allows nicely to > trace the thermal rise profile - I hadn't expected that). Of course, an > F-16 isn't thrown so wildly around as the DG-101G for the same magnitude > of turbulence , but then it has 100 times the mass .. and the F-16's flight computer compensates for non commanded aircraft movements. Note that the JSBSim environment model is in the middle of a major overhaul so I wouldn't make too much of it at this point. It would be more interesting to see how it compares after the rewrite. Erik |