|
From: Bertrand C. <bco...@gm...> - 2011-01-29 17:01:54
|
A better improved patch that supersedes the previous FuelDensity.diff I sent to this list. This one takes /consumables/fuel/tank[n]/density-ppg into account in the calcs. Cheers, Bertrand. 2011/1/29 Bertrand Coconnier <bco...@gm...>: > 2011/1/28 Hal V. Engel <hv...@gm...>: >> A thread was opened on the forum about how the C172P appeared to be >> incorrectly calculating the amount of fuel in gallons based on the weight of >> the fuel. It appears that the conversion is using 6.6 lbs/gal when it should >> be using something close to 6.0. That is >> >> /fdm/jsbsim/propulsion/tank[n]/contents-lbs divided by >> /consumables/fuel/tank[n]/level-us_gal == 6.6 >> >> I also had an issue with this for the p51d-jsbsim model and I had to use 6.6 >> as the conversion factor when setting up the fuel tanks in order to get >> /consumables/fuel/tank[n]/level-us_gal to report the correct amount of fuel. >> What is really strange is that /consumables/fuel/tank[n]/density-ppg = 6.0. >> Is this a bug or is there some other issue that aircraft developers need to be >> aware of to get this to work correctly? >> >> Hal >> > > Hi Hal, > > This is somehow a bug since the fuel density is hardcoded to 6.6 > lbs/gal in src/FDM/JSBSim/JSBSim.cxx. Enclosed patch reads the fuel > density from JSBSim to make conversion between volume and density. > > Note that JSBSim allows different sort of fuel density to be used (see > JSBSim reference manual chapter 3.1.7.1 pp. 39-40). Most of the fuels > seem to be around 6.6 lbs/gal with the notable exception of AVGAS and > HYDRAZINE. > > Cheers, > > Bertrand. > |