|
From: James T. <zak...@ma...> - 2010-03-10 16:29:41
|
On 10 Mar 2010, at 15:44, syd adams wrote: > It is a bit of a turn off though, when I try to fix some minor issues and get back into the coding side of things. and its immediately rewritten without notice. I apologise for committing the modified changes without asking - I felt my modifications were fairly straightforward, and hence unlikely to be a problem. The actual core logic should be exactly as you provided in the patch. > My main wish is that the enabling option be renamed to <has-overspeed-indicator> (or something more appropriate). > And that it not break should it be enabled with no parameters.Yes , it could happen :). Understood, I'll fix these later on today. I'm still not-exactly-trhilled about hard-coding the B1900 numbers, but I don't have a better suggestion either! James |