Re: [Flightgear-devel] Google Bug Tracker and Aircrafts

[syd a. <ada...@gm...>]

Yeah this was discussed earlier because that list rapidly filled up with old
"bugs" .
I agree , missing features , or incomplete feature , or not knowing  how an
instrument works shouldn't be filed as a bug :)


On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Heiko Schulz <aei...@ya...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The Google Bug tracker is a nice instrument for the harcore developers
> here.
> But I have some problems with bug tracking there on aircrafts.
>
> All our aircrafts are in developement. It is difficult to say an aircraft
> is completly 100% ready. A lot of bugs often aren't more than just missing
> features.
>
> As an example: someone wrote that the Cessna Citation Bravo's ADF needle
> isn't working. In the description it sounds a bit different, as it just
> doesn't shows any NDB's. Does it ever have? To my knowledge not, so it is a
> missing feature, not a bug.
>
> Another example: someone noticed that the 737-300 shows two different
> cockpit- a 2d one and a 3d one.  As it was exactly my intention, to keep the
> 2d-panel as long the flightdeck is not usuable as like the 2d-panel, and so
> I noted that in the ReadMe-file.
> Quote:"This is the 737-300 in Progress...
> The Boeing 737-300 is now under work to be improved and come much closer to
> reality....For seeing the 3d-cockpit in progress pan the view so the
> 2d-panel will dissapear"
>
> I wonder if a bug-tracker makes really sense here- we have more than 130
> (?) aircrafts and I know a lot of them which do not have any proper cockpit;
> fdm; autopilot; systems etc... all bugs? Or just in development?
>
> I think aircrafts should be excluded as long they aren't part of the base
> package.
>
> Anyone agree or disgagree?
> Heiko
>
>
>
>
> still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html
> But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz
> gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Fli...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>