|
From: Csaba H. <csa...@gm...> - 2009-11-28 00:25:23
|
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:56 AM, James Sleeman <fli...@go...> wrote: > Csaba Halász wrote: >> These are two questions as I see it. >> James wants to *use* pulse while most users would be happy to just >> have FG work *around* pulse. >> For this latter case, I believe an alsoftrc with alsa driver and >> dmix/dsnoop devices should be fine. >> > > I could work around pulse, by killing pulse, using flightgear and > restarting pulse. But that seems a particularly unpleasant workaround. But have you actually tried keeping pulse running and directing openal to alsa dmix? I don't use pulse myself, so I am just guessing that the topology would be something like this: FG -----------> OpenAl ---> ALSA (dmix) ----> hardware app1 ----------------> pulse ----^ app2 --- ALSA (pulse) ---^ -- Csaba/Jester |