From: till b. <bu...@bu...> - 2008-01-30 22:56:14
|
hi stuart, i have missed you on irc today. and i wanted to tell you that indeed the second patch is much better in terms of memory usage. it saves 80 megs of allocations compared to your first patch :-) and considering it looks even prettier than the first one... congratulations! -till On Monday 28 January 2008, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > The current patch is a bit better for memory usage IIRC, but it is still > quite hefty - a side-effect of generating all the trees at once for the > tile. > > -Stuart |